Chapter 1474

Recently, many people on the Internet are attacking me, saying that I have disturbed the industry order, so what is the industry order?

Industry order, I think should include technology market order, talent market order, management market order, investment development order and so on. I'm not an expert, I can't say those professional terms. Today, I just want to talk about my views from the perspective of consumers.

As an IT product consumer, I take the most intuitive computer as an example. I want to buy a computer. There are two ways to order it online and in a physical store.

And to use a computer, in addition to buying this computer, I need to install the software I need to use.

So I plan to buy a computer, the cost is 6000 yuan RMB, and I like a computer that costs 5999 yuan, but actually when I buy it, the cost will be higher than this.

Because I want to install software, the most basic, I want to install the system. There are two main choices in this, one is Lianxiang Yinshan's XOS disc and Microsoft's Vista disc.

The retail price of the former is 499 yuan. If the system is pre installed, the price should be 199 yuan. What about Microsoft? The retail price is several times, even the pre installed system, the price is close to 1000 yuan.

This doesn't mean that you need to buy a desktop computer. Generally, you need a patch panel, a network cable, and a network installation. These related products are another sum of money.

So the actual cost of buying a computer = computer cost + software price + store cost + accessories price + profit

what is the real cost of a computer in this? How much is the profit? Who made the biggest profit?

Shop rent, agent profit, PC manufacturer profit, software manufacturer profit There are too many people who spend money in it.

Who has the highest profit margin? Microsoft.

Microsoft claims to have invested tens of billions of dollars in the development of Vista, but where did the tens of billions come from? The profits they make from selling XP system are enough to develop Vista and XP more than ten times!

Where does Bill Gates' wealth come from? It's all Microsoft. What about my wealth? From a variety of investments, it investment profits, in all my income, is not a big head.

I just invest in a lot of industries, each of which can bring a little profit in the future, and when combined, my income will increase a lot.

In other words, as consumers, we all want to buy the desired products at a lower price. But as a manufacturer and seller, they want to make enough profits.

How to form a balance between the two, I think it is best to use the concept of supermarket to operate. In short, it's a small profit and a quick turnover.

I want to build a computer industry with small profits and high sales, no matter hardware or software, the manufacturer must have profits, but the single product profits should not be so high.

Now I have invested in all kinds of hardware accessories, software and PC manufacturers to give consumers a reasonable price.

And the result? I touched the interests of those manufacturers, they unite, attack me, slander me, say I destroy the order of the industry?

Keep high profits, even if the products can't be sold, they won't sell at a reduced price. That's their order?

Is it their order to define computers as high-end electronic products rather than ordinary household appliances?

Is it against order for someone to reduce the price and let the profit to the consumers?

If these are the so-called industrial orders, then I would say that the enterprises I invest in will not abide by these "orders"!

They put order into a shackle. They want to lock in other enterprises, lock in profits, let consumers follow them and keep them in the dark.

I will break this shackle, break the order and rebuild a new and reasonable order!

Many people used Bill Gates as an example, dropped out of school and established a huge Microsoft empire. But if there was no Paul Allen, how could Bill Gates succeed?

And a lot of people may not know that Bill Gates's mother, who used to be a good friend of IBM's chairman and CEO, worked together as an executive at an intercontinental bank.

That's why Bill Gates's original software was sold to IBM, and why Microsoft's DOS was promoted by IBM and became the industry standard with the help of IBM.

There is no conflict between going to school and doing business. I finished my studies, so today I can surpass Bill Gates in wealth.

Those who regard dropping out of school as the golden rule and think the world is not waiting for others are all blinded by this story. I don't deny that Bill Gates is excellent, but also don't forget that Paul Allen and Steve Ballmer, who started their business together with him, would not have Microsoft today without their efforts and the help of Bill's mother.

I want to say that Bill Gates is not a good example. Our young people, do not learn unless your mother has an incomparable background.In addition, Intel has always boasted that its products are the best in the world, but in the witness of hundreds of media around the world, their products have been completely defeated by SUPERWAY semiconductor.

We should be clear that the larger the output of most products, the lower the cost. But the output of Intel is obviously higher than that of Huawei, the performance is the same as that of Huawei, and even lower than that of Huawei, but the price is much higher.

So relatively speaking, Intel's profit is much higher.

At this time, the sales price of SUPERWAY can guarantee normal profits. It is said that the profits of Intech at the same price should be higher. If not, there are only two possibilities.

The first one, inter, lies. Second, Intel's technology is not as good as Huawei's. As for which one, I'm also curious.

If Intech lies, their profits are huge profits. If Intel doesn't lie, it's their technology research and development that's not as good as SUPERWAY semiconductor.

Here I would like to ask the representative of Intel, which of my guesses is right? Or is there a third possibility, both?

There are also PC manufacturers who constantly attack Lianxiang group, why? Because their products are far less cost-effective than Lianxiang models. Their 10, 000 yuan laptop is worse than the 8000 yuan laptop.

They don't want to lower their prices, but they want Lianxiang group to raise their prices. Frankly speaking, Lianxiang group's sales price will increase. Although the sales volume may decrease, the single product profit will increase by a large margin, and Lianxiang group may earn more.

But we have no such choice. We have chosen to let more consumers buy computers with reasonable prices. We want to make computers a common household product rather than a so-called high-end electronic product.

These are what I want to say today, the conscience of a conscientious entrepreneur!

…… (to be continued. )