Large enterprises of the state must guarantee high dividends every year and hand over profits to the state. Then the fund is not enough to develop how to do, IPO.
That is to say, they could have developed well, but they divided the money and took the money to invest elsewhere. As a result, they didn't make as much money as they did here. What's the loss?
This is equivalent to two people doing business together and exchanging shares. As a result, other companies don't make much money, but your company can make a lot of money. Then they make a lot of money and go away, but you only make a little. Is this kind of exchange cost-effective?
"Feng Yu, no, this is not what you said. Local economic development, infrastructure and people's livelihood construction always need money, right. The central and central governments themselves plan as a whole to ensure better local development. Isn't this the case with all countries collecting taxes and allocating funds? Is everyone wrong? " Zhang Ruiqiang shakes his head and thinks that Feng Yu's thoughts are all unreasonable.
"Then I ask you, what are you going to do with the car businesses we acquired from abroad some time ago? Directly incorporated into some state-owned vehicle enterprises, and then force each other to pay a certain amount of profits every year, right? "
"Do you know why the development of state-owned automobile enterprises can not compare with that of Bingcheng machinery manufacturing group? Because their investment in technology is far less than that of us. And they seem to pay a lot of dividends every year, but look at the company's development and the real ability to make money. Which enterprise do you think is more profitable? "
"Why do we have to allocate funds to those enterprises, and then force them to pay certain profits? Why can't we invest directly?"
Direct investment? What does Zhang Ruiqiang mean by his blank face?
Feng Yu went on to explain: "you see, the money of state-owned capital to buy these businesses is the pension fund that is used, right? Then ask them to pay in the profits and fill in the account. So why not count this asset directly as a pension fund investment? "
"The development of an enterprise should follow the path of sound development. How much profit can be paid depends not on how much you want, but on how much can be left after the most reasonable investment of the company has been cut."
"I ask you, if the pension fund invests in icecity machinery manufacturing group, will anyone object? Is there anyone who would object to investing in Lianxiang group? Or invest in Leha group, who will object? "
"Why not invest directly instead of forcing profits to be turned over after the allocation? These investments are appreciating every year, and there are good dividends, isn't that good? "
Zhang Ruiqiang hesitated and said, "but the state-owned investment company has less cash?"
"What is the purpose of the investment company? Making money, right? So you don't do this kind of high-quality investment, but you do some general investment with money, which is the right choice? "
"Who says it must be wrong to invest in domestic enterprises? Let domestic enterprises go global, different can earn foreign money? "
"Look at my companies. They are based at home, but which one is not developed abroad now? If you look at those foreign companies, which one is not the first to run their own base camp, and then want to expand outwards? "
"What do you look like when you invest abroad with a large amount of money like this? It's like a child carrying a bag of cash to buy things. Although others know that it's illegal to rob, they can also put this bag of money into their own pocket if they cheat you legally to spend."
Now many people think that if you don't invest money, you can't earn money from foreigners. Isn't export earning foreign money?
You only want to invest money and make money, but you ignore that your family has made more money. Isn't that putting the cart before the horse?
"Well, what you said seems reasonable, but there is something wrong. I'm in a bit of a mess now. I'll think about it later. "
In a few words, Feng Yu has given no consideration to some of the strategies above. It can't be said that all the strategies developed by so many people above are wrong?
Of course, Feng Yu also knows that this kind of foreign investment is necessary. Sometimes it can achieve some political and political intentions, which can also obtain huge economic benefits.
For example, some African investment can't earn money from the local government, but it can be exchanged for some African countries to support China in some UN UN UN votes, so that China can get more benefits in other aspects.
But investment also has to be selective, and there is a better way to go. Why take the rugged mountain road?
"If you think about it later, our country's pension is rising every year. This is a way for the country's economy to become better, a return to the people, and an effective way to enhance people's cohesion."
"Do you think that the money earned by your investment way is faster than the increase of pension? Now, how many only children are there in our country? After two only children get married, they will have another child. That is, two children have to support four old people and one child. "
"You say that the old people now have pension or pension. That's right. Do you find a problem? There are only two people who pay pension, but there are four old people who receive pension. That is to say, the number of people who receive pension is twice the number who pay it, right?""When we think about the restructuring of state-owned enterprises, are there any similar problems? Too many retirees and too much pension burden will eventually bring down the enterprise. "
"Is that very similar to the present situation? The aging of our country is more and more serious. With the improvement of medical and health technologies, people's life expectancy is longer and longer, so the time of receiving pension is longer and longer. This burden will be heavier and heavier. "
"What do you do when you spend more than you earn?"
The retirees who were in charge of their own enterprises at the beginning are now the social security of the whole people. All the money is handed over to the state, and then the state undertakes the pension of these people.
A good solution for an enterprise, then how to solve for a country? It's just a little money. Can it be done? At that time, enterprises could stop paying wages and retirement benefits. Could the state suspend the social security expenditure of these people? There's going to be a big mess!
You say that the pension will not rise, but the price is rising, and the money is not enough for the elderly. Is that ok? Let the working people pay more pension, then when these people retire, you have to give more pension, this is a vicious circle.
The most direct way is to make more money from these paid pensions. There are so many pensions handed in by the whole people every month. As long as we can invest reasonably, we can earn enough money back.
By drawing blood from enterprises, it's just drinking poison to quench thirst. Sooner or later, these enterprises will be destroyed.
So pension can not be so investment, we must invest in some businesses that can make more money! (to be continued. )