Chapter 646

On the first day of the Lunar New Year's day, I wish you a happy New Year! Good luck in the year of the rooster!

"The 84th Academy Awards ceremony will start soon. Anyone with a clear eye should be clear: George Clooney, Brad Pitt, Tom Cruise and a large group of Hollywood's handsome core stars are actually secondary goods. The big boss who really dominates the whole situation is the fat man behind the crowd Harvey Weinstein!"

"Because, a very serious fact is: from last year's" the king's speech "kicking off" social network ", all the way to the best actor, best director, best film three awards in the bag, to this year's" artist "is almost a complete copy of the" King's "brilliant road to the Olympics, is bound to be invincible and win the full house!"

"The ownership of Oscar Awards is controlled by the invisible hands of Harvey Weinstein, which has become a clear rule that can be written into a publication. From today on, every Hollywood actor should take" follow Harvey Weinstein to eat meat "as his life creed

Putting down his newspaper, Howard Rodman shook his head and said to his old friend, "Oscar is going to change his name to Weinstein."

"Is that exaggeration?" My old friend didn't think so.

"Isn't it?" Howard Rodman cautioned, "think back, how much controversy did Harvey Weinstein create for Oscar, starting with the British patient?"

The man sat there and thought for a while, then finally nodded, "a few times it turned Oscar into a joke."

Howard Rodman put the paper on the table. "Oscar's name is not Weinstein. He's never anybody."

After a little thought, Howard Rodman said to his friend, "Oscar can't go on like this. If you go on like this, the Weinstein brothers will become the spokesmen of Oscar. I will mobilize people on my side to try not to vote for Weinstein pictures. "

The old friend looked at the newspaper and said, "it's very reasonable. In order to get the Oscar, many actors have no limit to flatter the Weinstein brothers, but they never pay attention to the authority of the Academy. Is the Oscar not from the Academy, but from the Weinstein brothers?"

Cold hum a body, he said, "I leave first, I want to go back to communicate with people."

"Good." Howard Rodman nodded. "I won't see you off. I'm going to make a few calls."

Since 1989, he has become a member of the Academy of film arts and Sciences and has the right to vote. As the vice president of the American writers' Association, he is a representative of the writers' rights organization in the academy and one of the most influential core figures in the Academy.

In addition to the media coverage of the 20th century film, especially the media coverage of Wayne meadows's past achievements, he also mentioned the differences between Wayne meadows and Wayne meadows The older they get, the more they cherish their feathers. Oscar is no longer their Oscar, but Weinstein.

Inspired by Murphy and fox in the 20th century, some media have praised Harvey Weinstein to a high level.

"Harvey Weinstein, the one who really decides where the Oscars belong!"

"What makes a film a big Oscar winner? Analyzing the past 20 years, it's not hard to find that if you follow Harvey Weinstein, you can win the Oscars! "

"Oscar changed his name to Weinstein, who can solve the secret that can't be said?"

These remarks in the traditional media can affect the judges of the Oscars, especially those college conservatives who cherish the feathers of the Oscars.

In addition to the paper media, as the live broadcast Party of this year's Oscars ceremony, ABC TV station, which is affiliated to Walt Disney, also broadcast the Oscar prospect program for two consecutive nights in prime time on the channel with the highest ratings in the United States. This paper focuses on the analysis of the brilliant achievements of the Weinstein brothers in the past Oscars, proving that the name of Oscar is really about to change to Weinstein.

"Harvey Weinstein's trial and error in Oscar public relations has led to a terrible misunderstanding that" Oscar judges are a bunch of idiots "for those fans all over the world who know more and more about the Oscars: from the earliest" British patient "sweeping the Oscars, to Shakespeare's love story" rescuing Private Ryan "at the end of the century, and then to Chicago, Harvey Weinstein is always playing PR tricks

"Of course, you have to admit that Harvey Weinstein's way of manipulating the Oscars is also keeping pace with the times: in the British patient, he likes to boast that his film is" the greatest and moving work in many years ", but in the operation of the king's speech, he openly expressed his disgust with this kind of label propaganda, in order to allude to the boasting of the social network Impetuous; when he was in Chicago, he was keen to attack his competitors on the side, and the gifts he gave during canvassing were relatively ugly. But later, when he saw the producer's e-mail canvassing incident in the bomb disposal unit, he immediately narrowed his ambition to win the prize and focused on the best supporting actor. ""By last year's the king's speech, he knew that film critics are a group of very annoying guys, so he said publicly that" the Academy Awards judges have their own aesthetic judgment, and of course they will not be influenced by the taste of film critics. " This not only flatters the people of the Academy of film arts, but also frees up energy to win the three major trade union awards, realizing the final turn over of the film. "

"In addition, this year's" the artist "debut, you can almost see a strategist Harvey Weinstein, who has implemented a more perfect plan than ever before: never flaunt the film as a tribute; never attack opponents to promote themselves, but let people completely forget" Diego Ross "and" tree of life "when the union awards were awarded 》And through the media again and again, he said that he was a "person who respects the art of film."

Just like the media said that Murphy is connected with drug trafficking syndicates, this is the truth. Murphy can't explain. Even though he has no economic contact with rose, let alone interest exchange, he can't explain clearly. He can't explain what Harvey Weinstein has done in the past. The more Harvey Weinstein explains, the more members of the college will see His unorthodox influence at the Oscars.

It's OK to put this kind of influence in the dark, but on the surface, those old men who are conservative and have strong self-esteem are certainly not happy.

Some of the old judges Murphy met even had this idea. Are we all a group of old muddleheaded people who are manipulated by the Weinstein brothers?

Although he saw the effect faintly, Murphy didn't stop. The media's praise of Harvey Weinstein ran through the whole voting period.

Especially in Hollywood Reporter, which has a huge influence in the circle, Murphy directly spent a lot of money to buy important pages one after another to continue to report Harvey Weinstein's Oscar career after the voting time entered the middle of the voting period.

"The artist, Harvey Weinstein's gift for Oscar!"

What the core members of the Academy dislike most may be different from each other, but there is something in common. They always dislike the behavior of striking the Oscar for the sake of striking the Oscar.

"As early as last May, at Cannes International Film Festival, Harvey Weinstein found that this film is a tailor-made gift for the voters of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, whose average age is as high as 56 years old: black and white, silent, imitating the actions of Hollywood classic stars, simple logic and just right 100 minutes, which are very suitable for him to enter It works. "

"What's more, the time difference between the trial day and the public day is the same as" the king's speech ": in that year," the king's speech "was highly praised at the Toronto Film Festival in September of the previous year, but its large-scale release was arranged before the Oscars, while its competitor" social network "had been dried up; and" the artist "was the same It took a long time for public opinion to warm up before the awards to gradually expand the scale of the show. Although some audiences rushed into the cinema and found that it was a silent film, they were fooled and asked to refund their tickets, the news itself was a selling point, which further made voters feel that the Oscars still need to focus on the key grades, and the ordinary audiences have no culture... "

"Harvey Weinstein has now become the manipulator behind the Oscars. If you want to know in advance what's the hot spot for the Oscars? It's very simple. Just look into Weinstein's project schedule

At the same time, Murphy did not ignore the influence of the critics on the Oscars.

Stephen Colbert, a famous critic, roared in his "Bert time" program, accusing "the artist" of being "disgusting" flattery. The film changed its original intention in order to show affection to the Academy, and "despicably" edited the film into black and white silent film!

Later, professional film critics in Los Angeles, led by Todd McCarthy and Kenneth Turan, also attacked the artist in their columns.

"The artist is full of the tendency to show affection to the Hollywood Academy in the whole process of running for the election, and its work itself does not meet the consistent selection criteria of Oscar!"

"If I have to pay for black and white art, I'd rather read the New York Times. If the Oscar goes to the artist, it's better to give it to transformers. At least it's more enjoyable."

All kinds of hype continued until the middle of February. With the arrival of the deadline for college voting, the media and Hollywood suddenly became quiet. Everyone was waiting for the start of the Oscar ceremony.