Chapter 705

The battle between the king of heroes and the king of Conquest came to an end, and the battle between Qisi and Qili was still burning. However, the battle between saber and Berker is the most attractive.

The former King Arthur, and the former Knight of the round table -- Lancelot.

In the battle between the two men, the BGM of Lancelot's betrayal and the battle of sword hurdle hill in "fate / a1t day a Avalon's court" rings out with deep grief.

Altoria's glory and her downfall alternately appear in people's minds, which makes people feel difficult to name.

At the last moment, Lancelot showed her true body. After conquering the king's army, it was a heavy blow to her heart, even more than before.

The appearance of being out of one's wits makes people completely unable to see the King Arthur waving the dazzling light.

For the Holy Grail, for the re-election of the king, only in this way can we get salvation - altoria thought so, with such a childish idea, she put the sword in her hand into Lancelot's chest.

Tears from the nearly dry eyes left, she did not feel.

Lancelot fell down with a satisfied smile.

"King Arthur doesn't understand people."

This sentence once again reverberated in the audience's ears, leaving the audience with a long sigh of regret.

Now, she still doesn't understand.

Lancelot just felt guilty for betraying his most revered king Arthur and hoped to get the punishment he deserved, so now he left with a smile.

The appearance of Lancelot. Maybe it's not a coincidence, because his wish is King Arthur. As long as King Arthur is called, he will follow.

There is nothing wrong with the Knights' words to her, the hero King's ridicule, and the conqueror King's saying that she is "naive". Until now, she still does not understand that she is the only one who can become the king.

"In the theory of three kings, the words of King conquest to King Arthur remind me of a story: a college student came out of a poor mountain area. The villagers pooled money to get him through college. After graduation, he did not choose a high-income job in a big city. Instead, he went back to his hometown to be a rural teacher and repay the kindness of the villagers with his own actions. Unexpectedly, the villagers are not willing to send their children to school, because they see that he spent so much money to finish college, and finally stayed in the nameless village. What is the significance of reading. According to RI der, saber is just like the college student, who only wants to help others, but does not lead others. Maybe this kind heart will save them temporarily, but their future is dark. "

"Many years ago, I just wanted to be a kind person. Punishing the evil and promoting the good, protecting the weak. Finally, it turned out that it was just a childish idea. Saber's chivalry is undoubtedly shining with the glory of justice, but can this spirit really be implemented? How many people will carry out this spirit of respecting sacrifice and dedication. As RI der said, "who in the world will look forward to the thorny road called martyrdom, and even dream of it."

"Adam Smith pointed out in the wealth of Nations: everyone enters the market out of selfish desire, and under the guidance of the invisible hand, it maximizes the social welfare. Human nature is evil. Only selfishness is the inexhaustible driving force of human action. In other words, only people's conscious action can improve their lives. The help of the strong to the weak can only improve the weak temporarily. After that, the fate of the weak will not change. Only when the weak act consciously can they save themselves permanently. The failure of the planned economy is an attempt to strangle the selfish nature and plan people's lives with top-down orders instead of making people consciously pursue their own happiness. Lead the people, not save them, because blindly saving brings only temporary improvement and a dark future. " One fan said how he felt about King Arthur.

There has been a saying in China since ancient times: it is better to teach people to fish than to teach them to fish.

With the return of the spirit to the Holy Grail, the Holy Grail appears. In the Holy Grail, there is a black substance overflowing with the smell of "evil", which corrodes and burns everything around.

Chesi came to the inside of the Grail. This is the Grail's response to him. As long as he accepts it, the Grail will be available.

However, is the "Holy Grail" in front of him the Holy Grail he prayed for?

On the inside of the Grail, you see the Grail question.

The Grail assumes an extreme scenario in which Chesi chooses one of the two ships to save the passengers. The contradiction of justice of the chieftain can be explained by a very classic paradox: the tram paradox.

"Tram problem" is one of the most famous thought experiments in the field of ethics. Its content is roughly as follows: a madman tied five innocent people to the tram track. A runaway tram was coming towards them and was about to run over them in a moment. Fortunately, you can pull a tie rod to get the tram to another track. But there's another problem. The madman tied a man on the other track. Considering the above situation, should you pull the bar?The tram problem was first proposed by the philosopher phi1 ippafoot to criticize the main theories in ethical philosophy, especially utilitarianism. According to utilitarianism, most moral decisions are made according to the principle of "providing the greatest benefit for the greatest number of people". From a utilitarian point of view, the obvious choice should be to pull the bar, save five people and kill only one.

But utilitarian critics argue that once you pull the bar, you become an accomplice in immoral behavior - you are partly responsible for the death of a single person on another track. However, others think that if you are in such a situation and ask you to do something, your inaction will be equally immoral. In short, there is no complete moral behavior, and that's the point. Many philosophers use the tram problem as an example to express the situation in real life, often forcing a person to violate his own moral standards, and there are still cases where there is no complete moral practice.

This is a proposition that is discussed and unsolved forever in ethics and philosophy. However, in reality, people must be forced to make a choice. Rawls' theory of justice puts forward two principles: "everyone's interests", that is, everyone has equal rights in freedom and interests“ "Equal and open to all", that is, unequal social and economic arrangements, should be reasonably expected for everyone, and posts linked with unequal interests should be open to all, with risks to be borne.

Based on the former, we can't make the ethical choice between the minority and the majority; Based on the latter (the same is based on the spirit of the law, so the law is just a bad way to justify, but it is the best way we can choose), we must find a responsible object: for example, the five people in front should not have appeared on the railway, while the one in the back completely trusted that the railway should not have passed by, Then the driver's choice should be (but not the so-called right choice) to let the car go on and kill five people (because they take the risk for their own behavior, which is also the consequence of the accident itself). If he changes the track, he will murder the innocent person.

The principle of inheriting is to abandon the minority and save the majority.

Then the scene continues to be extreme. If a few people on the ship entangle him and force him to save himself, what will he do? The Holy Grail gives the answer to his heart, which is to kill a few people. If the rescued majority is divided into two groups, and the same extreme situation occurs again, he will continue to abandon the minority to save the majority, and will not hesitate to kill the minority.

As a result, more people are likely to be rescued than killed. In fact, this is exactly the way Chieh Si has been behaving, sacrificing a few people in order to save more people. Even at the expense of these few people, it is not what he wants.

His idealism lies in his attempt to bear other people's life. He is choosing what is good for human beings. In the way of Machiavellianism, he quantifies all human beings as chess pieces. Their own ideals and emotions can be abandoned and ignored, and then pursue an optimization.

But the contradiction is that he is making the best choice for all, but he is forced to see and admit that his way can not save all. So he will put a hope of overcoming human nature and delusion that everyone will be happy on the Holy Grail of achieving any miracle, even if he does not know how to achieve it.

However, the last words of the Grail to CESI are very intriguing“ The way you know nothing can't be contained in your wishes. " If you want to achieve a wish, it can only be achieved in the way you know. And the so-called miracle can not exist in the pursuit of their own ignorance, but set up a voluntary, but can not rely on their own efforts to achieve things.

People can't pursue what they don't know.

The scene that the Holy Grail was given to him was his wish.

What is the wish of cutting the heir?

Peace forever.

And what is the peace achieved by this polluted Holy Grail, or by the means known to the heirs themselves?

If we kill all the people in the world, if there is no one, there will be no fighting, then there will be peace?

This is the answer the Grail gives to the heir - if it is to be used to realize the wish, it is to destroy mankind.

However, this was not what Chieh Si wanted at all, which ran counter to his wishes.

It can be said that in that moment, his desire disappeared, his means were denied, and his belief collapsed.

Of course, he rejected the Grail - a denial of himself（ It's not finished yet. If you like this work, you are welcome to vote for recommendation and monthly ticket. Your support is my biggest motivation. Mobile users can go to M. to read.)

...