Chesi has a dream. He wants to create a world where no one cries.

This is not his wishful thinking, but his firmer ideal after recognizing the cruelty of reality.

Dreams alone can't change the reality, and there are dreams that can't be realized only by efforts.

Because the so-called "dream" is usually the opposite of a person's reality, which is unrealistic and difficult to realize. When the dream shines into reality, it is more beautiful, but also illusory, and more real, but also far away.

According to the common customs, it doesn't matter that children should have dreams, because children are characterized by innocence; It doesn't matter that teenagers should have ideals, which are greater than reality, because teenagers are characterized by overconfidence, but adults must be realistic, because adults shoulder social and family responsibilities and can't be willful.

Therefore, maturity means to learn to accept, compromise and give up. The so-called acceptance refers to adapting to the objective society which does not shift from individual consciousness; The so-called compromise refers to not thinking that one's own ideas can be 100% realized, learning to communicate and discuss, lowering conditions and goals; The so-called abandonment refers to giving up naive and stubborn ideas and looking at problems realistically with the psychology of focusing on success or failure.

On the one hand, he insisted on his dream more than anyone else, but when he realized that it was almost impossible to realize his dream, he fell into deep despair; On the one hand, he learned to think realistically like an adult in his efforts to save the world, and guided his behavior with a set of utilitarian ethics.

In order to save the majority and sacrifice the few, under the support of this creed. Chieh Si always chooses to save the majority and kill the minority, even if the minority is innocent, according to the equal standard of no distinction between the old and the young.

These two propositions should belong to the category of political ethics, that is, whether the interests of the minority can be sacrificed for the interests of the majority? For the purpose of justice, can we do without means? In the grief of qieshi, it is more a question of personal conscience.

He is like an adult. He gave up the ideal of being a just partner when he was a child - just like an adult, he learned to adapt to this extremely cruel world. He also incarnated himself as Shura, and began to lower his price and target. Although he saved people, he didn't want to save everyone. Start the necessary abandonment, choose to save the majority and kill the minority at the cost of success or failure.

But he still wants to create a world where no one is crying, and he will still suffer for his hands full of blood... So it can be imagined that this is a twisted soul struggling in such a violent way!

"Justice" is a very delicate thing, because it is intangible. It's just a concept that exists in the human mind. It can be very simple, like Superman to protect the earth is just, conversely, the monster against the earth is evil; It can also be very complex. For example, Rawls's great work on justice does not put an end to the academic debate on justice, but causes more controversy in the academic circle.

Justice may seem ridiculous and childish to the mature people, but when "fast zero" shows all this in a different way. But people have to think deeply.

Lin Luo is just one of hechen's numerous fans. People will get something when they grow up. Something will be lost, too. In his eyes, Chieh Si is more like the shadow of them who "grow up with what they have abandoned" described by the master porter.

"Young Chieh Hei naturally does not understand the meaning of the word" justice "in politics and ethics. When he grows up, people will not know whether he has ever thought about it. The porter has not written about it. However, his behavior since his patricide has touched the theoretical and practical scope of political ethics," he said

"So the complexity of the cut off. It may be that he is the personification of a political idea, but in "fate zero". As the opposite character of Qisi, it is obvious that Qili is aimed at the human side of Qisi. And altoria is aiming at the materialization of the political idea of Chiese. "

"Saber, as the legendary King Arthur of the ancient British Kingdom, is an idealized Knight incarnation. She abides by chivalry, and her heirs who do things for the purpose of achieving their goals are like ice and fire. Perhaps it is the dramatic conflict created by such opposing ideas that they choose saber as their hero. Therefore, although there are not many, the opposition of the two people's positions and the contradiction of their ideas have become one of the main features of the work. The few dialogues between the two people are still the hot spots of controversy. "

"He thinks that Saber's justice is pedantic and useless, and in Saber's view, his unprincipled behavior is unforgivable. In fact, what he said is not unreasonable. Isn't Saber's insistence on justice the end of being betrayed by his subordinates and the fall of his country? Although the practice of severance is merciless, it will not lead everyone to destruction together in the name of justice. If it is from the perspective of taking the overall situation of the country and society into consideration, severance's behavior naturally has its rationality, while saber seems too ideal and naive. ""Politics is dirty, but saber, as the monarch of a country, as the political center and power holder of a country, is so holy that he lacks human feelings, which is incredible. In contrast, although the conquering king Iskandar has a dream of endless sea and is also very human, he will also use dishonorable means. From this point of view, it is quite reasonable for the conqueror to say that saber is not qualified to be king. "

"Well, if saber is the embodiment of the ideal of justice, isn't she a dream illuminated by reality that makes people feel distant, illusory and meaningless? He can't accept saber, can't he accept the one he has given up? Can't bear to see her like this, doomed to lose

Others asked him what he thought of Eli. As a character who has always been the protagonist in the story, and is the core of the fourth Grail War and the fifth Grail War, he is as controversial as CESI, and their bodies are full of mysterious and contradictory colors.

After thinking about it, Lin Luo replied: "if the heart of Chieh Si is like an angel, then the heart of Qi Li is like a devil - Chieh Si longs for a world where no one cries, and when he sees other people suffering, he will also suffer; Qi Li's nature is to take other people's pain as his own source of happiness, so the opposition between Qie Si and Qi Li is essentially different from saber, because he and saber have the same feelings of concern for heaven and compassion for people and yearning for a better world, but they choose different roads, while he and Qi Li are different in nature, even though they do things by the same means. "

People may be the descendants of angels and demons, and there are both good and evil in their hearts, but this is the view of comparative literature and art.

Good and evil are people's value judgments, and values are different in ancient and modern times. Therefore, people may only have ideas and behaviors, but good and evil are different. However, man is a social animal, which is reflected in the human body. It is usually not the nature but the sociality. It can be said that almost no one in the society is born and is shaped by the society.

"Therefore, we can see that although Qi Li's nature is extremely evil, he has been demanding himself by social standards and living a self-restraint and diligent life. Although he knows that his son is not like his father, his father can't see him through. Qi Li himself became the opposite of himself, suppressing his nature everywhere, making him not know what kind of person he was, what he longed for, and the alienation of human nature

"What about the heirs? Similarly, after realizing the cruelty of reality, he became a person who was totally opposite to his nature. Therefore, in the ending of "fast zero", Qili looks at the heir who recovers himself, longs for salvation and goes into the fire to save others. It is a meaningful contrast, because the two men speculate that the other side has been fighting for so long, and finally they are really relative, but they find that they are not interested in the other side. "

"What this shows is that the society can arrange two people who are not interested in each other into fatalistic enemies. Of course, this also includes people who originally like each other, such as saber and R, two heroic heroes full of chivalry, who cherish each other and fight each other. As for Qie Si and Qi Li, they are purely arranged by fate. The latter gets in the way of the former, while the deeply contradictory former attracts the latter's great interest. "

"In many cases, there are many things that people are not willing to do, but are forced by the situation. But gradually, they will get used to and adapt. This can be said to be people's self alienation or socialization. But with the small power of individuals, if they want to survive better in the society, isn't such sacrifice the price of happiness?"

Chieh Si and saber are two people who are not willing to give up their ideals, but they choose different ways to realize their ideals. Subtly, they end up in the same way.

Saber and Chesi reflect the two sides of fraternity, the idealized side in mind and the difficult side in reality. Qi Li is the profile of fate, reflecting the cold, empty and even meaningless fate.

The ideal finally succumbed to the reality and destiny( (to be continued)

ps Thank you for your support【 Who said that I see piracy, heaven and death, shallow and smooth, the other way, the king, the lost skeleton, the thunder, the old skeleton, the star ¤ Yu Shang, confused demon moon]