Chapter 853

What the hell is that?

It's amazing that not only Luo Wenxuan but also the students of Lu Zhou, even Lu Zhou himself, can't believe the content of this email.

After Reading Professor Fieldings's opinion carefully, Lu Zhou understood his meaning.

According to Professor faltins, he believes that there is a great controversy in some positions in the paper, which leads to serious proof defects in the core part of the whole paper, which is not enough to prove that when the value of ε is infinite, there is no non-zero trivial point of ζ function in the region of re (s) ≥ 1 - ε.

To tell you the truth, Lu Zhou wrote this paper, and it was the first time that he was beaten back and asked for rectification.

Standing at the back of the boat, he saw the review comments from the beginning to the end. Luo Wenxuan swallowed and asked.

"Prove there is a problem?"

Lu Zhou shook his head and said, "it's too early to make a conclusion now. Let me see."

Hearing this, he Changwen, who was sitting with his ears up, almost didn't turn his pen around and fly out.

Yes.

When others receive the reply letter suggesting rectification, the first reaction is to change it honestly and finish it. When the reviewer is comfortable and when he can finish it, this big guy will have a look at it

Think of here, he Changwen's heart also can't help but a whole feeling.

Big guy is a big guy

When will he be so awesome

I didn't notice what some of my students were thinking.

Having said that, Lu Zhou stooped down, turned out the printed version of the paper that had previously proved the quasi Riemann conjecture from the cabinet under the desk, and checked it line by line against the position pointed out by Professor faltins.

Because he couldn't understand the profound thing of analytic number theory, Luo Wenxuan stood in the back of the boat, pretending to understand and waiting for the result quietly.

That's it. It took about ten minutes.

Just as Luo Wenxuan was about to yawn, Lu Zhou suddenly snapped the paper in his hand and left the stack of paper on the table.

Seeing Lu Zhou finished, Luo Wenxuan asked curiously.

"What was the result?"

Lu Zhou shook his head.

"I don't think there's a problem with what I wrote."

Luo Wenxuan hesitated for a moment and asked, "well Is Professor fortings wrong? "

When he said this, he had no heart.

That's professor fortings, the first person in mathematics after grotendic.

As for the influence in mathematics, I'm afraid it's a little bigger than my tutor Edward Witten.

But this old gentleman is also famous for his eccentric temper. He is not as popular as witten in the academic circle.

"It's too early to discuss who's right and who's wrong," he said, rising from his chair and pausing for a moment. "I'll talk to Professor fortings about it."

"I'm afraid it's a little difficult to communicate with Professor fortings What he recognized will not change, and... " Hesitated for a moment, Luo Wenxuan still opened his mouth to remind him that " If you can't persuade him, I'm afraid you'll be constantly sneered at by him. "

"It's all secondary," Lu said indifferently. "If he's right, I'll correct it. If I'm right, I won't change a symbol. "

Luo Wenxuan asked, "if none of you can persuade anyone?"

This kind of situation is also quite common in the mathematical field. When the academic level of the two people is almost the same and the discourse power in the academic field is very close, it is really difficult to convince anyone on some specious issues.

After all, the deeper the research goes into the frontier, the less obvious many things are. Sometimes for the same problem, two different schools of thought have two different views, and they have argued for quite a long time, which is possible.

Of course, that's where the magic of mathematics lies.

No matter how much controversy there is, there has never been a controversy that can last forever. The right party will always stand out from the crowd. Even though the three mathematical crises that broke out in history almost shook the foundation of the whole mathematical building, at last people found a proper way to resolve all the disputes.

"If no one can persuade anyone..."

After a pause, the boat continued as if nothing had happened.

"It depends on who we can persuade the others."

……

There will never be an airtight wall in the world.

Especially when there are a group of creatures who are passionate about gossip on the edge of the wall.

On the night when Lu Zhou received the review comments from the mathematics annual, a big event happened in mathover flow.Some people burst out suddenly, and the paper about "quasi Riemann conjecture" which was delivered by Lu Zhou in the mathematics Yearbook was beaten back by the reviewer professor fortings.

As soon as the news came out, it immediately ignited the topic of the whole forum. Almost as long as we open the forum, we can see that someone is discussing this matter warmly.

[Professor Lu was rejected?! The sun is coming out to the West! ]

[as I said, his proof has serious defects, and you all spray me. Now look, I'm not the only one who thinks so. Even professor fortings thinks so. Why don't you spray it? Fools! ]

[rejection is common, isn't it? Even the top scholars will inevitably have some small flaws in their papers. ]

[this is not as simple as rejection. Didn't you see the screenshot? The wording of rejection is not as simple as some minor flaws, but "there are major flaws in the core argument". Do you know what this means? Generally speaking, this sentence means that if you can't make a satisfactory supplementary explanation for this, the next time is not to call back for your rectification, but to throw it directly into the wastebasket! ]

[this is unusual anyway ]

[nothing unusual, after all, the reviewer is fartins. This old man is famous for his lack of human feelings. Otherwise, he would not be able to stay in Princeton and run back to Germany to teach This is too offensive. Please allow me to remain anonymous. ]

【…… ]

in fact, strictly speaking, the reviewer's review process should be strictly confidential, but somehow, some screenshots of the review comments reply were leaked by some boring people.

When the editorial department of mathematics annual found out about this, it immediately contacted the administrator of mathover flow forum, and the administrator of M forum also deleted the explosive post. But the Internet is such a thing. Once a secret is known by more than two people, it cannot be called a secret.

What's more, there is a lack of gossip in the field of mathematics, so that small things with big sesame seeds can cause hot discussion in the whole academic circle.

Not to mention, it's the two big bull men, i.e. faltins and the land boat. The focus of the argument is around the problem of Riemann's conjecture about the nuclear bomb level

The dispute lasted for three days, and neither party responded.

One is a forum that young scholars don't usually go to. As for another, although he has an account, he probably doesn't care to explain.

When the discussion continued to ferment, when people were talking about what further action would be taken when landing on the boat or in fartins, Jinling University, which had been outside the whirlpool of public opinion, suddenly released a heavy message on the official website.

The content of the message is very short, but only a hundred words.

However, the amount of information is so huge that almost everyone has not responded.

[on December 18, our university will launch an academic report on the theme of "quasi Riemann conjecture proof" in the auditorium of the old campus, and answer the questions of scholars from all walks of life on the spot about the questions in the process of proof. At present, the registration channel has been opened. Those who are interested in participating should submit the registration information before the deadline of December 7. ]

[speaker of the report: Lu Zhou (academician)]

almost on the day when this message was released

The whole field of mathematics is boiling!