You know, it's the Su-30MKK fighter bomber. It's the only fighter bomber in the world that can be as famous as the F-15E fighter bomber of the United States. Even the U.S. military has a high evaluation on this type of fighter bomber.
As a result, such a world-famous super model is just like a piece of ragged sack discarded at random by the two aviation commanders. Who wants it? Anyway, they don't want it.
What does that mean?
The performance of fbc-1a fighter bomber is no less than that of Russian Su-30MKK fighter bomber, and even more than that of Russian Su-30MKK fighter bomber in some aspects.
In fact, it is true. If not, why should the two chief officers of the aviation force put aside their faces and say that they want to seize the fbc-1a fighter bomber in front of so many people?
It's not that the two men have passed this strategic air defense exercise and seen that the fbc-1a fighter bomber is extraordinary.
It is the so-called layman watching the scene and the expert looking at the door. The air defense force leader's opinion on the fbc-1a fighter bomber is also from the perspective of air defense forces. It is not that he does not want to see the fbc-1a fighter bomber more comprehensively. The problem is that his own specialty and limitations make it difficult for him to get a comprehensive perspective.
The two chief officers of the air force are different. Since they saw the real-time picture of the fbc-1a fighter bomber attacking in attack leopard mode and carrying dzb-1500 stealth air launched cruise missile, they were deeply attracted by the vigorous posture and powerful ground attack power of the fbc-1a fighter bomber.
So that for a long time afterwards, they did not have much communication with other army cadres and leaders who participated in the observation, because they were looking at, evaluating and measuring the role that fbc-1a fighter bombers could play in their own troops; they were also able to fight in the key southeast coastal areas; what capabilities they had in the situation of the snow area and the border area; and then they were Training, logistics, maintenance and so on.
The final conclusion is that fbc-1a fighter bomber is not necessarily the best fighter bomber in the world, but it is definitely the fighter bomber most suitable for the actual situation in China.
One of them alone is enough for the two to fight for the top. What's more, the fbc-1a fighter bomber also applies some advanced technologies of the next generation of fighter planes in stealth leopard mode.
Yes, in stealth leopard mode, fbc-1a fighter bomber has indeed applied one of the key technologies of the next generation of fighter aircraft, that is, airframe bomb cabin.
According to the principle, there is no way to make the airframe bomb cabin with the aerodynamic shape and comprehensive structure of fbc-1a fighter bomber. Only by overthrowing the whole fbc-1a fighter bomber and redesigning the aerodynamic shape, mechanical structure and various systems can the required bomb cabin be reluctantly installed.
The problem is that it's no different from redesigning a brand new combat aircraft. It's not only time-consuming and labor-consuming, but also has a long development cycle. What's more, it's not cost-effective, so it won't be the first choice.
Since it is not to change the structure of the airframe, how does the fbc-1a fighter bomber realize the magic ability of the airframe bomb cabin?
That's because Tengfei group introduced a concept called "type guaranteed tactical cabin".
Of course, the concept of "conformal tactical cabin" sounds a bit confusing. In fact, the basis of this concept is actually the conformal fuel tank that Tengfei group has tailored for fbc-1a fighter bombers.
After all, even the strong 5h take-off group of Hongtong factory has tried to tailor a rear conformal fuel tank for it, so as to greatly improve the operational radius of the strong 5 fighter. Naturally, we can't favor one over the other and leave the fbc-1a fighter bomber project of Northwest Airlines factory, which is also in the industrial alliance, out of our control.
So they helped the fbc-1a fighter bomber to do a set of things.
However, the aerodynamic layout of the fbc-1a fighter bomber is different from that of the strong 5h fighter bomber, and the chief engineer of the fbc-1a fighter bomber requests to improve its ultra-low altitude penetration capability, especially the supersonic low altitude rapid penetration, which should last at least 5 to 10 minutes.
This target is very easy to achieve for the next generation of combat aircraft, but it is obviously too high for a fighter bomber that uses many second-generation aircraft technologies and just touches the threshold of third-generation aircraft.
The problem is that the chief engineer of fbc-1a fighter bomber has set such a high target, and it's no wonder that Tengfei group, who wants to make money in the engine, immediately reduces the supply of parts for wd-62sm turbofan engine for various reasons after the new medium thrust engine wd-62suv with thrust weight ratio of 8 comes out.
Leading to the acquisition of the engine production technology and a complete set of technology, the engine production enterprise of Northwest Airlines factory is fishing for three days and drying the net for two days, which can not meet the engine supply of fbc-1a fighter bomber after mass production.
The engine manufacturers of northwest airlines have not thought about fighting. Is the problem useful? The core aircraft is produced by Tengfei group. Their northwest factory doesn't have the production technology at all. If you dare to fight, Tengfei group will dare to cut off the core aircraft. Anyway, Tengfei group Aero Engine Co., Ltd. has more products. Why should they give you the northwest factory to produce the core aircraft?Isn't it good to produce wd-58l turbofan engine for Bombardier's Chinese assembly plant?
Even if we don't produce aeroengines for aviation enterprises, now Tengfei group's gas turbines are also in hot demand. Is it reasonable to change production so that customers don't wait too long?
In a word, there are too many reasons for Tengfei group not to produce supporting core aircraft. It doesn't need to be too horizontal. A nice receptionist's polite telephone explanation is enough.
This is the so-called aircraft engine hegemony.
Tengfei group has never let Northwest Airlines plant, the leading unit of fbc-1a fighter bomber, use its own wd-62suv new medium thrust engine. However, when Zhuang Jianye made the production adjustment of aero-engine parts and invited the fbc-1a fighter bomber chief engineer and other research teams to visit the ground test of wd-62suv new medium thrust engine, fbc-1a fighter bombing started The project team resolutely abandoned its own wd-62sm turbofan engine and chose wd-62suv.
Now that we have a better engine, the comprehensive index of fbc-1a fighter bomber must be improved. Otherwise, why change the engine?
Is the wd-62sm turbofan engine just fine?
Therefore, the chief engineer of the fbc-1a fighter bomber said that he wanted to retaliate for the aeroengine hegemony of the take-off group or deliberately embarrass the take-off group.
In any case, the fbc-1a fighter bomber with wd-62suv new medium thrust engine, without any traditional auxiliary fuel tank, has a maximum take-off weight of 30.2 tons and a combat radius of more than 2800 km with 8 tons of standard ammunition.
Ultra low altitude penetration should also have a combat radius of more than 1800 km, and be able to carry out low altitude supersonic penetration for 5 to 10 minutes at critical moments.
In this way, if we use the strong 5h back conformal fuel tank, it is obviously not suitable for the fbc-1a fighter bomber, so the engineers of Tengfei group found a new way, and adopted a streamlined conformal fuel tank design which is very close to the external structure of the inlet on both sides of the fbc-1a fighter bomber, which perfectly solved the problem.