It's not that Zhuang Jianye didn't explain this to dicastro, saying that this is an ordinary artistic performance, pure art. I hope the Ottoman side doesn't interpret it too much. As for those dirty pictures, they are all the embodiment of art, expressing the fusion and sublimation of spirit and flesh. I hope the Ottoman authorities will open their mind, Look at it from the aesthetic perspective of art.
But the problem is that the more Zhuang Jianye explains, the more scared dicastro is. You know, they have consulted senior people in Europe and the United States. This kind of large formation UAV control can't be despised, but few people in the world can play it to perfection.
Among other things, the precise positioning of each UAV is not a simple matter.
Because the positioning accuracy of this kind of large formation dense combination is accurate to centimeter level, not to mention the ordinary civil GPS satellite positioning system, even the military level is not up to, because the accuracy of GPS used by the US military is only 1 meter level, far less than the level of UAV dense formation control.
Because of this, we must adopt a more accurate positioning method.
In today's world, the enterprises that can achieve high-precision positioning in a small range, in addition to Boeing in the United States, are China's take-off, because the two companies are the only two in the world with IGPS, that is, the core technology of indoor precise positioning system.
At the same time, it is the only company in the world that can provide the most innovative pulsating aircraft production line solutions.
Although in terms of market share, China's take-off pulsating production line program is not as powerful as Boeing's, but it can also enjoy a 35% share.
At worst, it can give many aviation manufacturers a backup choice. Once they choose, it is not as simple as a simple indoor precise positioning system, but around this system, they need to purchase a complete set of supporting equipment in line with China's take-off standards to realize the assembly of pulsating production line.
Because of this, the sale of every indoor positioning system is accompanied by the dumping of almost a whole set of assembly lines, which is often a three to four year cycle and a large order of billions of dollars.
Take the indoor precise positioning system delivered to Indonesia aerospace industry group not long ago as an example. Indonesia signed a procurement contract with China Tengfei in March 1999, and China Tengfei officially delivered it in August 2001, which took three years.
Because in addition to the positioning system itself, all other assembly equipment used by Indonesia will have to be replaced, otherwise it will not be able to match the positioning system of China's take-off, and it will not be able to give full play to the best effect of this set of precise positioning system.
For this reason, Indonesia has not hesitated. After all, the replacement of the whole assembly line will cost US $4.8 billion. If the personnel training and production line maintenance in the later stage are included, the total investment will reach US $5.4 billion, which is not a small fraction for Indonesia, which has just come out of the financial crisis.
Therefore, Indonesia has considered similar products of Boeing. After all, Indonesia's standards are closer to those of the West. It thinks that adopting Boeing's products can reduce the number of equipment replacement and thus save costs.
As a result, the Indonesian side was startled. The price of Boeing's optical indoor precise positioning system is about $3.3 billion. Not to mention that other equipment also needs to be replaced. The reason given by Boeing is that they have upgraded their technical standards, and the old equipment in the past can't adapt to the new standards, so they need to replace all of them.
As for the price, it's not expensive. It's only 11.5 billion US dollars. Boeing's children and old people are not fooled.
When Indonesia looks around, it decisively chooses China's take-off plan. Even if the standard is different, the price of China's take-off plan is less than half. Anyway, it has to be completely replaced. Naturally, it's how cheap it is.
What people in the industry didn't expect is that China take off not only applies this set of underlying technical principles to the pulsating production line in aviation production, but also slightly changes it to the bee colony matrix control of UAV.
To know that the assembly accuracy of aircraft is to reach millimeter level, which is much more stringent than that of UAV. Therefore, there is no difficulty for China take-off to master the core technology of IGPS. The key lies in whether it dares to break through and innovate in thinking. It is obvious that China take-off has gone far beyond the imagination of the industry in this respect.
But in fact, China's take-off is much bolder than expected by the industry. In fact, China's take-off at this time is not satisfied with the simple actions of controlling the UAV formation on the ground. Instead, it has used a yun-15plus transport platform, equipped with improved UAV control equipment, to release the UAV formation in the air, and command it to patrol and attack the predetermined target.
When the technology is mature, it will even be applied to manned fighters, so that in low intensity air combat, the pilots of manned aircraft can control three to four large UAVs at the same time, and find their way to block guns in case of danger; When it's going well, they will directly surprise and attack the enemy.
At that time, with ty-22 stealth UAV, China's take-off will build a complete set of UAV combat system with the core of air combat, ground attack, swarm attack and air reconnaissance guidance. Even in some low-intensity armed conflicts, UAV will be used as the main battlefield rather than a simple auxiliary.
On this basis, the system can be simplified to complete the rapid iteration of civil UAV, which can not only be applied to all areas of the national economy, but also re-enter the consumer UAV market.
At that time, oretaya, which was acquired by Liszt, will not even be able to see the taillights of China's take-off. You should know that the core business of China's take-off is consumer UAV, not the whole UAV business. The core technologies of China's take-off are all concentrated in the field of military UAV, The civilian UAV is just a simple military technology, which can be used for civilian use.
Consumer UAV is a subdivision of civil UAV, not to mention.
China's take-off did not even bring out the high-end civilian UAVs for agriculture, power, resource exploration and territorial inspection, let alone the military UAVs at the top of the pyramid.
So what Liszt took away was a piece of fat, but for China's take-off, it was not even a bone injury.
Just because of this, people who know the inside story of China take-off will feel that your uncle will always be your uncle, Zhuang Jianye or Zhuang Jianye, and China take-off is still the ancestor of the UAV field!
In a word, China's take-off is not only not lost, but also very solid!
However, no matter what China's take-off does in the field of UAVs, an Istanbul performance show of UAVs is like the wings of a butterfly, which has profoundly changed the world aviation pattern. Through this performance show, many countries in the world see a brand-new aircraft development mode, and feel that the aviation manufacturing industry, which used to be out of reach, is not far away from themselves, Someone's they can't afford to play, UAV's can't say hello? As a result, UAV has once again become a new hot spot in the aviation industry, thus ushering in a new round of great development.