As soon as the voice was heard, Tang Lili, dressed in a smart lady's suit, pressed the automatic controller on her hand, and the screen immediately switched to present a three-dimensional picture of fc-23 heavy carrier based fighter.
Several members of the expert group from the headquarters sat up straight at once. Several old experts wearing glasses took off their eyes, wiped them with cloth and put them on again. Then they stared at the fc-23 three-dimensional picture on the screen.
There's no way. It's really the three-dimensional map that Tang Lili showed them that has a great visual impact on the experts at the headquarters.
Because of its simple appearance, modern layout and high-tech design language, the experts of the China assessment panel who are over 50 years old have come up with an unrealistic idea, that is, is the plane on the screen really a carrier based plane designed by the Chinese?
This is not only true of the experts of these expert groups, but also of Huang Feng and several other leaders and heads of the Navy.
It's no wonder these people have such an idea. In fact, most of the people present have done in-depth research on the development of China's take-off fighter, and the conclusions are consistent. In a word, the conservative is too conservative, and the avant-garde is too avant-garde.
It's not difficult to understand the conservative aspect. China's two main trainer attack planes, the chujiao 6pro and the Jian jiao-7max, are typical representatives of this aspect. It's impossible to say what high and new technologies are. Although they can meet the standards of light fighters in some indicators, they can still meet the requirements of heavy fighters in today's world, The light-duty route of China's take-off seems too out of place.
On the contrary, China's take-off is another radical attitude in terms of innovation, whether it's the "real dragon" series verification aircraft, or the semi stealth fc-21, or the so-called vertical take-off and landing fighter known as the Chinese version of yf-23.
Whether in terms of aerodynamic layout or detailed design, China's take-off is just like a new individual, only pursuing the ultimate innovation and technological breakthrough. It seems that if we don't engage in black technology, we will be sorry for China's take-off, so that every time these experts, leaders and leaders go to China's take-off, they will have a kind of flash in front of their eyes and a brainstorm like a science fiction blockbuster.
But the problem is that these models of China's take-off are advanced, and the technology is powerful, but the overall maturity is not high. Take the VTOL verification aircraft that surprised the audience not long ago. The variant flying wing layout similar to the yf-23 is really amazing, and the resulting supersonic cruise is also shocking enough, After that, the reality of crushing the opponent in the confrontation with the j-8e was also impressive, but the result
No army has developed it as a follow-up main aircraft. The reason is very simple. Despite the brilliant performance of VTOL in front of people, the VTOL which only flew for less than an hour was completely scrapped after all the dust settled.
The explanation given by China Tengfei is that because it is a verification test product, it does not use high-end wear-resistant equipment in terms of materials and technology, so its service life is not very ideal.
However, it's OK to fool laymen with this feeble explanation, and they are not so easy to fool. The fact that a real man pulls his crotch for the second half of his life only shows one problem, that is, China's take-off still has great defects in involving advanced materials and processing technology.
It is precisely because these core problems have not been solved that the high-end fighters of China's take-off are all based on the situation of test and verification aircraft, so that in the eyes of the outside world, China's take-off is constantly seeking technological breakthroughs, which seems to be the death of innovation.
However, in the eyes of the industry, China's take-off is a stupid behavior, and it can even be said that there is no essential difference between China's take-off and New Delhi's A-San's ambition.
If China Tengfei is interested in the research and development of fighter, it should work hard to find a mature model, and then make continuous improvement on the basis of this model.
Chenggong group, Dongbei group and even Hongtong group have developed little by little.
But China's take-off seems to disdain the step-by-step and down-to-earth progress. It always gives people a kind of impatience. If they want to fly in one step, the result is that they use too much force, which is counterproductive.
Because of this, many experts and leaders at the headquarters have expressed their feelings more than once that if China take off can find a balance point between the conservative light aircraft and the radical test and verification aircraft, it will definitely take a different road.
The problem is that this kind of balance point needs not only simple technology and process, but also not a single innovative achievement, but a master of aviation design with rich experience and a super team with strong executive ability.
China's take-off does not lack technology, but also leads the way in manufacturing technology. It lacks such a master aviation design team and a top-level R & D team.
As the saying goes, it takes ten years to cultivate a tree and a hundred years to cultivate a person. Such a master and a team can not be cultivated if we want to cultivate them. With the development of the domestic aviation industry for more than half a century, we have trained a master plus 1.5 core teams with the help of the whole country.
Naturally, a master is the chief engineer of No. 10 project. One of the 1.5 teams is No. 10 project team. Of course, now that No. 10 project has been developed, this team has been upgraded to No. 20 project team.
The remaining 0.5 is the R & D team of J-11 series. Because it still needs to rely on Russian technology output, the independence of this team is a little weak, only half of it.
And then... And then there's no more.
It's not that China doesn't want to cultivate more people. The problem is that without ten or twenty years of hard work, it can't even turn over a splash, let alone achieve results. Therefore, even if the state increases its support in this area, it can only wait quietly.
Under such circumstances, experts can only lament the misfortune of China's take-off. Without the guidance of the core team and masters, they can only make an unknown support in the field of fighter.
This is not only the misfortune of China's take-off, but also the sorrow of the entire domestic aviation industry?
However, at this moment, with Tang Lili showing the three-dimensional drawing of fc-23 heavy carrier based fighter, both the experts of the expert group and the leaders and heads of the Navy on the scene have a shocking idea in their hearts, that is, they are very likely to witness the birth of another domestic aviation design master and the R & D team around him.
The reason for this idea is very simple. Fc-23 on the screen perfectly integrates China's take-off with schizophrenia's conservatism and innovation, and forms a modern balance point.
Just ask, without the master's outline, without the interest of the team, how can we do this step!