Can the old expert not know what the word "unique" means?
It sounds like "unique". In fact, it's not much different from pointing to northeast aviation industry group and scolding "nothing".
The old expert was not angry. It was impossible. He squirmed his mouth and wanted to say something, but when the words came to his mouth, he was stunned and didn't say anything.
No way. Up to now, no one can blame the embarrassing situation of northeast aviation industry group. They can only blame themselves for their lack of morale.
As Zhuang Jianye said, everything is not difficult. As long as we can follow the established technical route, it is highly possible to realize it.
The revolutionary technology that China has taken off to change aviation manufacturing is to organically integrate advanced network technology and communication technology through common underlying software algorithms to realize local digital and intelligent production and manufacturing.
Whether network technology, communication technology or software technology are relatively mature things, which is why the old expert hinted that Huang Feng asked northeast aviation industry group to try after seeing some clues.
After all, this revolutionary manufacturing process is of great significance to the aviation manufacturing industry, and the most obvious benefit is the significant reduction of production costs.
After all, shortening the production cycle is tantamount to improving production efficiency, that is, reducing production costs in a disguised form.
No wonder Tang Lili dared to release five mass-produced shipborne aircraft models in five years at the China review meeting; No wonder China Tengfei can make amazing profits and concessions on fcnb-200-200400.
Relying on the advantages of high efficiency and low cost provided by this revolutionary production process relying on automation, networking and intelligence, China's take-off is really as willful as it wants.
For such a monopoly advantage that is almost rolled by technology, who is not jealous and who does not want it among the experts with the background of major aviation manufacturers?
But the question is, which aviation manufacturer can do it after years or decades of persistence?
You know, whether it is industrial control software, flexible tooling, professional equipment or jsnb series industrial design software, when China took off, there was no national financial support at the beginning, and there was no hope of success at the beginning.
Because foreign brands and services are very mature, you can spend less money to get better things.
In contrast, it is totally not worthwhile for the person in charge of a large state-owned aviation enterprise to develop a set of things that are obviously inferior to foreign mature brands at a higher cost, and there is no hope of recovering the cost in a short time.
After all, the assessment indicators of the superior are there. You tell the superior what will happen to me in 20 years. Even if the superior understands your good intentions, it is inevitable to say: "I know you are good for the future of the factory, but now we want to know how your profit this year is 15 percentage points less than last year!"
Under such circumstances, many enterprise leaders focus on those short-term and fast projects. For example, the leaders of aviation industry group sold the land and property of yun-10 supporting plant in mordu a few years ago, which doubled the total profit of that year.
As a result, the main person in charge of that session went to a large province in the Central Plains after the new year, did real leadership and completed the perfect cross-border. With such pearls and jade in front, others naturally followed suit.
What's more, the leaders of various enterprises have years. Make a three-year or five-year plan to make their own achievements. If they do something for 10 or 20 years, they leave in a few years, but the benefits let their successors enjoy their success. They are neither a philanthropist nor a living Bodhisattva. Why do they do such noble things?
All these things add up. It is difficult to persist for 8 or 9 years, even for 3 or 5 years. Of course, some fierce people who focus on their career and don't ask about their personal gains and losses do make a lot of long-term plans conducive to the development of the enterprise.
But often after such people leave office at the expiration of their term of office, the policies left behind, except for a few major policies that bring together the interests of all, are basically the result of people taking tea and dying.
There is no way. The new leader wants to follow the rules. The problem is that if he really wants to do so, the top will think you are incompetent, and the bottom will think that this leader is a little unworthy of his name. Therefore, in order to make the future and convince the public, the new leader should also make his own new policies and ideas.
But such changes have made many enterprises stick to their long-term plans and end up in vain after frequent tosses.
Therefore, it makes sense for Zhuang Jianye to say that they are "unique", because in the current domestic aviation and aerospace field, China's take-off model can not be copied. Among other things, Zhuang Jianye has been the leader of China's take-off for nearly 20 years, and such a long term of office is not comparable to that of other manufacturers.
Coupled with Zhuang Jianye's strong relationship with the upper class and his open and cooperative style, China can take off and constantly try on its own predetermined road.
Even if other people have the ability, dare to do what Zhuang Jianye says regardless of others?
For example, Huang Feng was determined to forge ahead when he first arrived at Northeast aviation industry group. He was ready to take over the set of China take-off and transform northeast aviation industry group into the second China take-off.
What happened?
The letter of accusation and anonymous report flew to the Ministry of aviation industry at that time. Some old leaders and heads of northeast aviation industry group often ran to northeast aviation industry group in the name of return visit and research during that time. They pointed out clearly and secretly, and simply made Huang Feng lose his temper.
No way, there are too many mothers-in-law above, and it's harder to mess with each other.
On Zhuang Jianye's side, there was a Yonghong factory before, which was merged by Zhuang Jianye, and then connected with the Ministry of aviation industry. As a result, it was separated from the aviation and aerospace complex.
Maybe some people will ridicule that China's take-off is because grandpa doesn't kiss, his uncle doesn't love, and his mother doesn't give milk to eat when he cries. It's very pitiful for the abandoned children of the domestic aviation industry,
But from another perspective, as a result, China's take-off does not have as many mothers-in-law as other aviation manufacturers, so cumbersome approval process, and not so much historical burden.
Because of this, Zhuang Jianye can freely sprinkle on the big picture of China's take-off, so as to create miracles one after another.
In contrast, other aviation manufacturers, including Northeast aviation industry group, really can't compare, let alone copy China's revolutionary production process.
Therefore, some experts of the expert group, including the old expert, don't look very good. Obviously, they haven't adapted to the fact that the aviation manufacturer behind them is far behind by China's take-off.
However, other people saw opportunities from the revolutionary production process of China's take-off. For example, a leader from a naval department has hardly said a word since the visit. After listening to the introduction, he pondered for a long time, and then tentatively asked, "President Zhuang, can your technical architecture be applied to the shipbuilding industry?"