Just like the emperor's new clothes, with the landing of fcnb-220 large civil aviation airliner, it is completely torn off. There is no huge market, no determination to bury oneself in the backbone, no independent sovereignty, and talk about development with chicken soup?
Only stupid and ridiculous!
The problem is how ridiculous it is. The fact is in front of us. George king can't disappear the fcnb-220 large civil aircraft that has been parked next to the red carpet out of thin air.
What can we do? Do you want to admit that your words are wrong?
George king really couldn't afford to lose his face, so he simply asked the photographer not to shoot the fcnb-220 large civil aircraft. As long as he couldn't see, it didn't exist. Even if he turned a blind eye, it had the same effect.
Therefore, in the live picture of CNN, the airport has a panoramic view. The grand handover ceremony is also visible to the naked eye, but the fcnb-220 large civil aircraft next to the red carpet can not be seen.
None of George King's explanations mentioned the plane, as if it really didn't exist.
The problem is that George King's practice was no problem ten years ago, or even five years ago. After all, CNN is a fighter in the media and has a huge voice.
But what era is it now?
Internet age!
All kinds of PC based social media, instant chat tools and video we media have long been in the ascendant, which is no longer the era of traditional media dominating the world.
Therefore, the absence of fcnb-220 large civil aircraft in CNN's report does not mean that people all over the world do not know, because enthusiastic netizens have long learned all kinds of news about fcnb-220 large civil aircraft from domestic Internet screenshots, and then, like porters, they all get it on the Internet.
For a time, foreign netizens were also very surprised, because from the public pictures, the aerodynamic shape of fcnb-220 large civil aircraft was significantly better than Boeing-737 and Airbus A-320.
In particular, the nose, which is more in line with aerodynamics, is sharp, round and does not lose space utilization. It is integrated with the front porthole as a whole. It is impossible to tell whether the nose is added with porthole or the nose grows in front of the porthole.
In addition, with the skin shining in the sun, the manufacturing level of the overall processing technology is self-evident. It is not only no worse than Boeing-737 and Airbus A-320, but also slightly higher than some hair surfaces.
Because some technical gods in the external network have pointed out that the level of fcnb-220 large civil aircraft nose alone is world-class, because this complex curved surface composite integrated molding technology is only mastered by Airbus and Boeing.
However, although it is not a problem in process and manufacturing technology, the models of the two giants that apply this technology, Boeing 787 and Airbus A350, have not been officially put into operation, and they are all used on dual channel intercontinental trunk airliners.
Single channel trunk airliner, fcnb-220 large civil aviation airliner is also the first model to apply this technology.
As for the benefits, of course, it goes without saying that in addition to reducing the structural weight and air resistance, the attenuation of radio waves of electronic equipment inside the nose will also be greatly reduced.
It is estimated that the only defect is that it is difficult to manufacture.
Of course, although it is known that fcnb-220 large civil aircraft has applied the integrated molding technology of complex curved surface composite materials, it is still impossible to judge from the pictures that China's take-off uses integrated molding of all carbon fiber composite materials similar to Boeing 787; Like the Airbus A350, it uses carbon fiber composites, aramid fiber materials and aluminum lithium alloy.
The two composite forming technologies have their own advantages. The technical route of Boeing 787 can greatly reduce the structural weight of the aircraft and improve the fuel economy and comfort of the aircraft.
The Airbus A350 is more convenient for aircraft maintenance and parts replacement.
The two technical routes are neither good nor bad. They mainly depend on the needs of users.
However, no matter what kind of technical route fcnb-220 uses, it is an indisputable fact that China's take-off is not much worse than Airbus and Boeing in terms of manufacturing capacity.
This can also be seen from the combination of supercritical wing and shark fin winglet used by fcnb-220, which not only reflects China's strong foundation in basic research such as aerodynamic shape and aerodynamics, but also reflects the manufacturing ability and process level.
After all, the theory and design of aviation products, especially the top high-end manufacturing products such as trunk airliners, are important, but they are not decisive. After all, there are so many basic things. As long as you have a little heart, you can make them with the popular industrial software.
The key is the realization process from design to manufacturing, which is the key in the key.
Why do people in Europe and the United States live so leisurely?
Every month with huge benefits, talking about all kinds of wonderful ideas, as if the world is really quiet.
The same "rich" countries such as Japan and South Korea were as tired as dogs and rolled up to the explosion one by one.
Is Japan and South Korea not working hard enough?
No, their industrial profits are too thin to make excess profits.
On the contrary, in Europe and the United States, despite the hollow industry for many years, the real core manufacturing industry is still firmly in hand.
Among other things, a Boeing 737 is worth 800 million shirts.
The fundamentally disproportionate manufacturing gap has created a gap like profit margin. Like natural scissors, they reap the labor achievements of low-end countries and cut off the foundation for their further development.
Because of this, but relying on the lucrative aviation manufacturing industry, Europe and the United States can feed a lot of lazy people without effort.
This is also the fundamental reason why Airbus and Boeing will spare no effort to step on the red line whenever there is a challenge to the existence of trunk airliners.
That's my job. Who dares to smash it? It's strange not to work hard!
Because of this, the trunk airliner market for so many years is completely the world of Airbus and Boeing. The two obviously compete, but actually engage in various py transactions in private. The final situation is that while the two markets of Europe and North America are open to each other, they work together to attack other global markets, including Asia, and jointly reap excess profits.
But where there is oppression, there is resistance. Who doesn't want to bite such an attractive big cake.
More precisely, that country doesn't want to live a happy life like Europe and the United States, with no worries about clothes and food, no pressure, work and vacation, work and outing?
Therefore, in recent years, many countries prefer to be suppressed by Airbus and Boeing, but also fight hard in this direction. Russia, South Africa, Japan, Canada and Brazil can be described as your singing and I'm on the stage, which makes Boeing and Airbus very busy.
The result was a thousand defenses, but it still let China take off, and the whole fcnb-220 large civil aircraft!