EGOT。

This is the abbreviation of the top Grand Slam of the four major arts awards in the United States. They are Emmy in the television industry, Grammy in the music industry, Oscar in the film industry, and Tony in the drama industry. Therefore, they are simply referred to as "egot". They are selected from the three candidates of each award, each with its own merits, In particular, Michael Bauer of "barber Todd" is undoubtedly the most popular winner.

But objectively speaking, from acting skills to word-of-mouth, from wind reviews to feedback, Lan Li of "les miserables" is a top performer in this year's drama field, and it is really difficult for other opponents to pose a threat.

The professional magazine "stage" wrote an article early, saying that this will be a grand event to witness the strong ascent of Langley. Even if Michael is mature, Tom is steady, and will is young, they can not pose an effective threat to Langley. Even in terms of the quality and depth of the performance, Langley's strong leading position is still unshakable.

In other words, this is the moment when almost everyone witnessed the birth of history!

After the Oliver prize, the Tony prize is coming. Does that mean that they will witness the storm coming, and then... The birth of a new king?

Now, the only obstacle and trouble is age.

Twenty three years old. She will turn 24 in November this year. This is really too young. In the first half of her twenties, she has reached a height that countless people can't reach in their lifetime. Is this really good? In the long career years in the future, is it really good to enter the "lifetime achievement award mode" ahead of time?

The most direct example is Judy foster. At the age of 14, she won the Oscar nomination for best supporting actress. At the age of 26, she has been the best actress in the Oscar twice. Her career has entered the stage of "lifelong achievement" ahead of schedule. It seems that she can never surpass the peak of her youth. Now, lanli is even younger than Judy!

Oscars have made a history, and it is almost impossible to copy and touch the history, so the Oliver awards and Tony Awards need to be so hasty?

As we all know, the drama circle is more cruel than the film industry. It's hard for outsiders to imagine the harsh requirements on qualifications, experience, precipitation and accumulation. In the young age, the elimination rate is very high, but after going through the initial stage, the career vitality of stage actors is longer and more vigorous. Actors, in particular, tend to peak around the age of 40.

Langley hall is not only young, but also junior. "Les miserables" is just his first starring stage work. It's too young for professionals in the field of drama. Compared with Michael Bauer, it's obviously a more intelligent and appropriate choice.

Although there is no "college public relations" above the Oliver awards, the industry rules exist by default, and they are more strict than the film industry. Those old scholars and die hards simply refuse to compromise, and there is no possibility of "opportunism". Therefore, there are still many variables in the award ceremony - lenley is still young, there are opportunities, and there are possibilities.

So, what's the probability of Randy's challenge to egot's grand slam?

Before the Tony Award, the Oliver award is an outpost, but before the award is announced, everything is possible!