Chapter 2136

From an objective point of view, there are some differences in animated films after all. It is difficult to involve the actors whether the word of mouth is excellent or not. More importantly, the director and production company will bear the consequences——

Praise, then the director's credit; Bad comments, then it's the director's responsibility. As for actors, they are just a piece of jigsaw puzzle of animated films, which has a very small impact on the quality of finished products; More strictly speaking, those comments don't even mention dubbing actors, there are only a few special situations.

For example, actors such as Kim Carrey or Robin Williams, who are gifted with natural comedy, can often give their characters distinctive features by dubbing, and make different adjustments according to their roles, which makes people shine; For example, Kevin Hart or Arnold Schwarzenegger are exceptional actors. The voice of the former is so distinctive that no matter what role he dubs, it is difficult to get rid of his own image. The voice of the latter lacks change, so that all dubbing work is stiff and clumsy. On the contrary, it may destroy the balance of the whole animated film and make people feel disappointed.

And so on.

Otherwise, the feedback on animated films will hardly mention the dubbing actors.

The most intuitive case is Tom Hanks, the core dubbing actor of the "Toy Story" trilogy. However, film critics have never commented on his dubbing, not because it is poor, but because it is not good enough to be discussed separately. They only need to evaluate the whole work.

As for whether the audience will enter the cinema because of the dubbing actors, it has been a mystery up to now. There is no direct or indirect data to give a systematic proof. The only thing that can show is that the influence must exist, but it is also negligible.

"Toy Story" trilogy, everyone knows, but only a few people know that the actor is Tom Hanks“ The "Shrek monster" series is very popular. The donkey voiced by Eddie Murphy is widely spread, but few people know about Princess Fiona voiced by Cameron Diaz and Shrek voiced by Mike mers.

These details are the best proof: dubbing actors, for animated films, are just icing on the cake, but not the finishing touch.

According to common sense, "super marine" should be the same.

But the situation of lanli is a little bit special: so far, lanli still keeps the box office invincible. After experiencing the ups and downs of "Star Trek" in the summer vacation, Hollywood has pushed lanli to the altar, which has also aroused more curiosity——

It's not just a simple curiosity about when lanli will encounter Waterloo and be officially broken into the box office; It is more curious whether the strong market influence of lanli can penetrate into animated films and make the film box office create more achievements. This is one of the reasons why Disney invited lanli to cooperate, and it is also an important data of market observation of the industry

To sum up, if Lanley is the last and only superstar of Hollywood in the 21st century, how far and how wide can this superstar influence the whole industry, and how much benefit can they make through Lanley, does the industry need to be adjusted?

In the final analysis, it's still interests.

To be honest, people in the industry are looking forward to lanli's further promotion of Box Office figures and even market potential, which is a good thing for all film companies and the entire film industry - lanli eats meat and drinks soup. Moreover, if we can copy lanli's rising curve and create another superstar, then there will be more people who eat meat, Who can refuse?

Therefore, more or less, people in the industry also pay attention to the box office performance of "super Marine Corps", especially after witnessing the Don Quixote grand party in Orlando Disneyland, they can't help rubbing their hands, just like gamblers rolling up their sleeves.

Before the box office figures come out, the first round of reviews from major media will take the lead!

"New York Post", 50 points, "super Marines", and even the title name seems to be the kind of fast food restaurant that will mix countless elements into a set meal and then bundle it to customers. It can be great, but only if one of the many elements is excellent. Unfortunately, in this case, the answer is disappointing - just relying on a cute white can't light up the whole movie. "

"Globe and mail", 60 points, "for me, so far, the best cartoon adaptation of superheroes is still Pixar's" Superman story "- because they are all about superheroes, the" super Marines "can't get out of Pixar's framework and lack enough novelty; In addition, the story can also see the shadow of DreamWorks' dragon training master, especially the scene of Xiaohong riding on Dabai's back. The lack of new ideas is undoubtedly a pity. Nevertheless, this work still interprets its own characteristics, which I can accept. "

Entertainment Weekly, 60 points, "generally speaking, this is a big white show. It's lovely, harmless, gentle, considerate and a little humorous. Therefore, even though the whole film is full of many flaws and lacks a highlight of sublimation, it is still worth watching in cinemas. "

Just like all popcorn movies, "super Marines" are also faced with the problem of finding a balance between "business and art". Film critics are inevitably harsh and harsh, and it is inevitable that bad reviews and medium reviews are not good reviews. All of the above comments criticize the movies. Obviously, they don't buy the movie, but a little unexpected, Among the first batch of 38 professional media reviews, zero difference review was successfully achieved!

Even though the controversial "Star Trek" in the summer archives has a bad comment, the "super marine" has achieved the feat of zero bad comment, with only five middle comments, including the "New York Post" which gave the lowest rating of 50 points. They still chose the middle comment instead of the bad one.

This also means that even if the New York Post doesn't like the film, it still doesn't hate it. It's far from a severe crusade. Fifty points is the lowest score in the first round. This is undoubtedly a very gratifying news for commercial films. Now it can be predicted that the audience will like it very much.

What's more, the first batch of comments had 33 good comments!

"American weekly", 90 points, "I promise with my own honor, or you can verify by yourself," super marine "is absolutely worth the ticket price, this is the" candy "of Halloween."

"Hollywood Reporter", 90 points, "the perfect fusion of eastern culture and Western culture after the collision, the perfect combination of scientific knowledge and entertainment effect," super Marine Corps "has done it!"

"The New York Times," 90 points, "I won't say it's the best superhero movie, but the reality is... Sweet! Sharp! Interesting! Deep! Excited! Humor! " "Super Marine Corps" has indeed completed a beautiful landing: starting from an original story, through the processing of superheroes, and finally settling in a warm and moving aftertaste. "

"Washington Post", 90 points, "watching movies is a pleasure, because movies are very enjoyable! But what makes this film stand out is not the action scenes, but the soul of the film. "

Obviously, this is not a full mark frenzy. The media didn't give full marks in a collective way. As those commentators said, there are indeed flaws in the film, but these flaws will not affect the overall viewing effect. Both the commentators and the high praise have reached a consensus on the entertainment level, which is also the reason for the "zero difference comment" - and the difference between the two kinds of comments lies in the fact that, In the opinion of high praise, flaws do not hide the good, while in the opinion of Zhongping, there is nothing wrong.

Can "super power team" become an immortal classic like "Toy Story 3"? The answer may be no, but is this work above the "excellent" level of the industry? The answer is yes. What's more, is it worth going to the cinema on holidays? Well, there is no doubt about the answer!

With Pixar absent from this year's summer program, Disney fulfilled the expectations of the public, handed over a good answer, bravely shouldered the responsibility of the market and won a round of applause.

Other favorable comments beyond 90 points also prove this point.

"Variety show", 89 points, "when you come across a work as interesting, exciting, fluent and visually wonderful as" super marine ", who cares what happens next and how the story ends? What's more, it has a super cute pet you can't refuse. "

"Chicago Sun", 88 points, "the story line is slightly aristocratic, but it stands out because of its vivid characters, which is also the charm of the film."

"Complete movie", 83 points, "a lot of moments," super Marines "seem too noisy, especially in order to create a happy and humorous effect; But these noisy moments don't cover up the delicate moments after the silence. It's precisely these moments that create charming effects. "

"Empire", 83 points, "after" ice and snow ", Disney once again dedicated a soul melting animation journey. Those sweet, delicate and gentle strokes, in a busy, noisy and noisy superhero story, successfully fell on the moving character relationship. This is a touching attempt."

"Los Angeles Times", 80 points, "takes the fantasy of Tech nerd as inspiration, endows the movie's main characters with superhero ability, and perfectly turns the comic fantasy into reality, which is undoubtedly the biggest success of the movie. In addition, the end of the whole film sublimates the whole story. "

Praise, praise, or praise!

Yishui's praise accurately grasped the essence of the whole film. Those humorous, those warm and those sprouting successfully moved the critical critics and ushered in a perfect start in the applause; If there's anything more perfect for the first batch of comments, it's the "playlist" comments.