Chapter 2172

"..." lame man, silent.

"..." big tongue man, silent.

"..." Engels, silence.

The whole topic has become more and more absurd, and the situation of lying is out of control. So, what should we do next? Shouldn't the director stop shooting? Does he just let them talk nonsense? How does the play end?

He had to lower his eyelids to avoid John and Langley's eyes and expressions. The most important thing is to hide his eyes. Otherwise, he would always be on the edge of the laughing field: God, what did he do wrong? Why did he test him so much?

The only one who was comfortable and calm at the scene should be David, or Langley.

David gently closed his mouth, calmly shifted his eyes, looked around the scene for a week, smashed it, smashed it, the confused eyes were still floating outside, just like those emotions had never happened. Is this heartless or innocent?

David looked around happily for a week. Then he regained his sight and fell back on the cocktail in front of him. Without warning, he lost his mind again. The focus and focus of the cocktail broke away. It was as if he was studying how the color of the cocktail was made. Then he suddenly said, "a new person came in yesterday."

There was no foreshadowing, no turning point, or even no connection, so he jumped from one topic to another. It was so strange and rigid that people were full of question marks. He couldn't help looking up at David, but David still didn't wake up. "Do you see?"

"Yes, I see it." The answer is the man with the big tongue, the man with the lame legs sitting beside him, and he's stunned - wait a minute, what about that nonsense? No follow-up? No tail? Where is it? Is this really good? Is this really OK?

David looked at the lame man and said sincerely, "I think I see a lame woman."

The lame man straightened his back slightly and tried to cheer up, but then he drooped down again. That kind of emotion was particularly obvious - it seemed strange at first, but it was not strange after the conversation, "she just sprained her ankle." The lame man expressed regret and choked his wrist. He turned his mouth and said, "in a few days, she will return to normal."

"Oh. What a pity. " David said regretfully, but the words didn't have too much regret. He said in a calm tone that didn't have any color at all, which gave rise to a little robot's sense of vision.

Then, the big tongued man sitting next to him didn't speak. He just nodded his head gently. After a long time, he said slowly, "it's a pity. It's true."

Silence.

Or silence.

According to the shooting plan, a siren should sound inside the hotel at this time to signal the time for hunting and interrupt the conversation of the three people. However, there seems to be something wrong with the props group. The siren does not sound on time, which creates silence; But the reason why he didn't interrupt the shooting was that he was curious about what would happen next, because the silence of the three people could taste the taste

The embarrassment in silence deliberately breaks the narrative rhythm and creates a contrast. Before that, those conversations began to ruminate, and the invisible irony and banter spread slowly; What's more, there are some differences in the way the three perform.

The lame man calms down, holding his own cocktail, and does not know what he is thinking; The big tongue man is pure in a daze, that "muddle" expression does not have any redundant emotion, as if the thought has already inserted the wing, so lost in thought.

As for David, his eyes are slightly dazed, but the rest of his eyes are moving slowly, because the moving speed is too slow to distinguish, but subtle changes can still convey emotions, which makes people wonder: what he is observing and thinking, and it seems that he is not thinking about anything, But the eyes are very different from those of men with big tongues.

The same is silent, the emotion between the three men is slowly surging sparks friction.

"Have you ever met a woman with a big tongue before?" Without warning - again, David broke the silence and threw out an obscure topic.

Big tongue man wakes up like a dream, "huh?" The question blurted out and looked up at David. "No, No. But I don't think that's the problem. "

What's the problem?

Instead of going on, the big tongued man asked, "what about you?"

"... No." What he said is no, but in fact, the confusion in his eyes is "don't know". David's words and deeds are different, and they convey more content.

"Beep!"

The siren finally came late, and it was very abrupt, which startled all the people on the scene, and then oggs called "card" to interrupt the shooting.

Because the sound of the police siren was so sudden, the scene was so shaken that everyone forgot the scene for the time being. After the shock, they slowly recovered, and the absurd Joy came to their faces. Then the corners of the mouth of the staff on the scene rose slightly.

Where does the joy come from?

In fact, it's very simple, that is, to speak nonsense seriously, to talk about those absurd and even terrible things in a scientific tone, which creates a black humor of irony and banter; But he went a step further: why do they perform like this?

In the first half, blue ritual analyzed the "human transformation to animal" from a scientific perspective and rose to the height of soul and reincarnation. This is obviously the absurdity of the story background created by Augs, which deprives the individual of the right to exist and regards life as a target to make complaints about. That is, a few people play God to decide the life and death and freedom of most people. Does this story sound familiar?

One hint: World War II.

Originally, David's three people were just discussing seriously, and the intention of Engels was to derive people's reflection on the background of the story through this kind of discussion, but the depth did not reach such a level; Now, guided by a bit of "David's" nonsense, black humor adds more layers.

In the second half, Langley extends his target from the lame man to the big tongue man. In the view of Argus, this is actually a move to paint a snake and add feet.

Augus hopes to express an idea through the situation of lame men: in the background of the film, those with defects are considered inferior, even if they are sick or disabled or obese, and then they are excluded, so lame men can only match lame women.

This is obviously a very, very cold-blooded and terrible idea.

It's enough to pick up the lame man. If we further guide the lame man to the big tongue man, it's like pushing the whole idea to the audience; But the latter part of the performance of Langley is very interesting.

John Riley said that his biggest problem may not be his big tongue, suggesting that he has other problems, and then threw the problem back to lanli, whether intentionally or unintentionally, focusing on lanli's reaction: words and deeds are inconsistent.

What does that mean?

This means that David does not know what he is looking for. If he is looking for a partner, he should look for the same housemaid as himself, just like "lame man vs lame woman"; But if we are looking for love, shouldn't we break the prejudice and shackles? In other words, David can't completely define love - after all, in the background of the story, love has become a formula.

That's math.

Mathematics is reason, and love is sensibility. These are two completely different things. Now they are restricted by rigid rules, so David is confused.

From the first scene, David's perplexity and tardiness run through all of Lanley's performances, which also gives the character more texture - why perplexity? What are the characteristics of tardiness? How much influence did the past stories and social system have on David?

These questions can be slowly extended with the progress of the story, and then the breadth, depth and width of the story can be virtually increased - only for those who are willing to think and think deeply.

From this point of view, the contradiction created by Lan Li's eyes and words can be regarded as a magic stroke, lighting up the whole scene in an instant.

Now, he is in a dilemma: what should he do? He likes some parts but dislikes some parts, so how to choose?

He likes the performance of Langley. Although he doesn't want to admit it, the fact is that Langley gives the characters more possibilities, some positive and some negative, but at least he can explore more possibilities through Langley's performance, which is also the highest goal expected by the film "lobster".

Langley is helping him make it happen.

But the rest of the staff outside of Argus are laughing wildly, especially at westshaw.

Poor Ben westshaw, holding his stomach, couldn't make any sound, burst into laughter in silence. His abdominal muscles were so stiff that he began to ache faintly. He looked at Langley and John, who were indifferent in front of him, and shook his head repeatedly. "You... Are not kind." Two people work together to pit him!

As the main culprits, Langley and John were indifferent, even exchanged a sight, with a calm face. Langley said calmly, "we are just finishing our work."

"Nonsense?" He wiped his wet eyes, and his facial muscles became stiff because he was too happy to laugh. During the performance, it's really hard to hold a smile. Please help the child.

In the face of the accusation, John and Langley exchanged a sight, and then both showed a smile, John said lightly, "I can't deny it."

Actually... Actually admitted like this? He was stunned.