Chapter 2381

What is the end? Did David poke himself blind? Is myopia woman really blind? And what's going to happen between them?

Or more precisely, what does the ending mean?

Are myopic women using David from beginning to end? Is all this just a plot to return to the city? Or is it from a higher level of social control? What's the conversation between the nearsighted woman and the lonely leader? Why did the lonely leader not kill the myopic woman, and why did the myopic woman tell David the truth? Why did David bury the lonely leader alive before he left, but the short-sighted woman didn't tell him in advance?

Can David really blind himself for love? Or maybe timid at the last minute? What is the deep meaning of David's hesitation? Just hesitating about love? Or does it have a deeper meaning? Why did David choose to escape the forest and return to the city? Does he understand what he needs to face after he is blind? Or is it just another blind love?

What's more, extending from the short-sighted women and David, this is a satire on marriage. The marriage relationship established with honesty is living in a lie. The situation of hotel managers and lame men is the same, and the role of "children" is also very interesting; Or the analysis of the society - the top-down class setting, the opposition between single and company life style, the form of mandatory life framework, and the rigid presentation mode, reflect the definition of interpersonal relationship in contemporary society.

Just through the setting of an ending, we can connect all the details of the whole movie, and then create the reflection of a hundred flowers blooming. Everyone can extend their different thinking about love, marriage, social system, traditional culture and so on from the story——

It is not only the advanced ideas of DINK family or celibacy, but also an in-depth discussion of the foundation of the whole society: society is composed of people, and the relationship between people weaves out the social framework, and finally forms a complete human civilization. But the key is how to define the so-called "relationship"?

Bang!

Bang bang!

With David and the short-sighted woman as the benchmark, the tentacles of divergent thinking spread towards the far boundary. The confusion and confusion were boiling fiercely, and then the hall of lumier awoke slowly

That's the real intention of Argus!

Just like casting a brick to attract a jade, the sudden end of the ending leaves endless thinking space, ignites the audience's storm of reflection, and really ignites deep thinking and excavation. The different ideas of different groups just prove the pluralism of society and form intertextuality with the society in the film.

Who knows? Maybe the real society is developing towards the fictional society in the film? Maybe the contemporary society is sliding into the endless abyss of hell?

Brilliant!

This is really a high-level movie - it's not for everyone to like it, but to strive for colorful differences. Whether you like it or hate it, it really pricks those sensitive nerves and makes the discussion lively. Only when you find problems, face them squarely and face them can you solve them.

It can be imagined that "lobster" will inevitably touch countless sensitive nerves. The extreme and rigid way of performance and the cold and sharp narrative lens are always choosing the bottom line, just like the style of works of Eugene, which reflects the reality of contemporary society with utopian irony.

Hoo Hoo!

Hoo Hoo!

In the mind one after another disordered thoughts surged up, gradually reflected, the image of different expressions also emerged in the audience's mouth.

There are excitement, impatience, liking, rejection, curiosity, disgust and so on. The complex emotions roll in the bottom of our eyes, and then we can't help but shake our head. Even if we hate them, we can see that the goal of angering them has been achieved, and their reaction is exactly what he wants to see, which puts the disgusters in a dilemma, Should they show it? Should they let Argus do it?

Some people stood up at the scene, but they didn't stand up and clap... Instead, they turned around and walked away, their angry back clearly showed their emotional eruption, and even some people scolded, "ridiculous! This is ridiculous! Disgusting, self righteous, arrogant

The anger continued to burst, and the whole Lumiere Hall's vision was projected in the past. "Bang" hit the door and slammed it away, leaving only the lingering sound of continuous shaking reverberating in the screening hall for a long time, making everyone keep the posture of turning and looking back.

"Puchi." Some people did not hold back, puffed out a laugh - such a scene; The black humor of "lobster" is exactly the same and complements each other. A movie that mocks social relations ends up being scolded by the audience. Isn't this act itself the best interpretation of the concept of Engels?

What's more, it's still France. France, which is relatively open-minded and advanced in speculation, has a philosophical heart in opening up emotional relations and breaking traditional relations, just as Langley implied in the ridicule of the red carpet. They are often able to take a more positive view of the behavior of "selecting tradition", which has also led to the birth of many works with different styles in the history of French films.

In contrast, the United States, which is based on traditional Protestant immigrants, is more strict and conservative in maintaining its traditional social culture. It is not as good as the international image of "open-minded" at all, and its inherent tradition has never changed.

Well, even in France, there are still spectators who leave in anger. Does this mean that "lobster" has really provoked some spectators to the bottom line?

Of course, the audience may also be American - because the speech just now is pure American accent. If Langley goes further, it's a Boston accent.

A laugh broke the deadlock in the Lumiere hall, and then the audience around them couldn't help laughing. In the final analysis, this is France, this is Cannes, the open way of thinking and positive viewing mood let the audience relax, absurd and helpless mixed emotions began to surge, laughter spilled over the corner of the mouth.

It's not the kind of "ha ha" belly laugh, but the kind of helpless "ha ha" light laughter, rolling in the deep of the throat, with a little irony, a little banter and a little joy, rolling in the dark like thunder, buzzing on the eardrum, which is a kind of wonderful viewing experience.

Then, the Lumiere hall finally came back to life, and after a while, the audience began to stand up and applaud for the film.

At this time, the movie subtitles have been rolling for nearly 60 seconds, and the length of this reaction arc is somewhat exaggerated.

Lanli looks back at Jack Gyllenhaal, who covers his mouth behind him. He can't help smiling. Jack puts down his right hand and says in an exaggerated mouth, "I'm sorry. I'm really sorry." but the smile at the bottom of his eyes and the corner of his mouth can't be hidden——

Jack was the first one to laugh.

Jack sincerely believes that the scene and situation at this moment are too absurd and too funny, especially the one who leaves behind is just like the carefully arranged but failed Wulong bridge, which makes the cruel reality of the film more real, and then the silent effect comes out.

Like Charlie Chaplin's "sad" comedy. Clearly should be afraid, sad cry of the bridge, but can't help laughing. Then, with a smile, he began to cry in silence.

Jack is trying to control his emotions, but obviously, the effect is not so good. He holds his slightly stiff abdominal muscles and laughs in silence.

Jack is very sorry for the look in lanli's eyes. He feels as if he has ruined the shock of the movie ending, but the laughter just can't stop.

Lan Li couldn't help but smile. He couldn't help laughing. He looked at Jack in front of him and shook his head. He seemed to be saying, "it's all your fault", but the laughter from his heart continued to overflow.

Then there was applause.

Pop. PA PA.

make love.

make love!

Boom boom!

Starting from the sparse applause, people come back one after another. The echo and lingering charm of their thoughts are temporarily precipitated. The confusion and shock hit their chest violently, and finally evolved into applause. They stand up to give praise to the crew and express their support.

Gradually, there are more and more applause, because the reflection is more and more turbulent, which makes the audience realize that the powerful power of the film has just begun to play a role, and the exclamation and praise are more and more fierce, which makes the applause become more and more enthusiastic.

At the end of the day, all the audience in the Lumiere hall stood up, and the thunderous applause continued to reverberate in the empty screening Hall - not because the film was loved by all, but because it caused a sharp difference, even the figure who just left the scene became the best footnotes, It clearly and profoundly presents the infinite possibility of the theme of the film.

From the silence of 60 seconds after the movie ended, to the continuous gathering of applause, and then to the standing ovation of the whole audience two minutes later, the reaction of "lobster" presents a wonderful development curve, presenting the audience's indescribable emotional feelings, but after all, it still gathers into thunderous applause, resounding through the Lumiere hall, and continues to rise, Like a roar, it hovers in the chest for a long time.

This storm has just begun.