Time pulled back to the previous afternoon, Chicago, aegis club.

"Sold out?" When Li Zitao knew the news, he was also very surprised.

He thought the limited edition would be popular, but he didn't expect them to be so crazy.

Less than four hours before he left Milwaukee, the remaining 40 were exhausted.

According to Cullen, when they called back to inform members who had previously refused to buy the news.

There is a 100% chance of placing an order if you overturn a previous decision on the spot.

"So we can't even dial the membership list of club 22, and 101 cars have been sold out." Karen had no choice but to mention it.

According to such a hot sales situation, he will be bombarded by phone calls from all sides.

"Very good. It seems that you need to move quickly to launch our next high-end limited edition customized product." Without waiting for Karen to answer, he hung up first.

Because he can imagine, the next overwhelming phone, this pot or to Karen to carry, who let him be boss!

……

……

At the time when Li Zitao kept throwing away the pot, a highly concerned trial case came to an end in North America.

In 1791, the first Congress appointed and passed the first amendment, which made it impossible for Congress to enact laws on the following matters:

that is, to establish a religion or prohibit the freedom of belief, to restrict the freedom of speech and the freedom of the press, or to restrict the people's right to peaceful assembly and the right to petition the government.

They are the so-called "freedom of speech" and "civil rights law."

Freedom of speech, which has been formulated in all countries, can be said that no country is as persistent and stubborn as the United States in terms of implementation and understanding.

This is one of the most important items in the declaration of independence. It is the cornerstone of the "free country".

On the basis of the first amendment, it also means that there must be no prior restrictions in the United States.

In other words, even if some people abuse this freedom, they can only punish after the event, that is, after the occurrence of the event, and can not prevent it in advance.

This is why later generations can always see "shocking" speeches on the Internet, but no one can stop him from speaking.

More simply, it is the most favorable legal support for American citizens to dare to ridicule the president and denounce the incompetence of the federal government on any occasion.

Because he did not actually pay action, even if he took a small step, he would be punished by law.

But no one can deprive him of his rights when his actions are limited to "oral presentation".

It has nothing to do with right or wrong, or truth, or whether the person is good or bad. It is only about the most basic right since human beings were born to speak.

The bill has also been extended to other places, such as news publications.

Of course, it also experienced some tests and changes before it developed into a situation similar to "unscrupulous" in the eyes of others.

The ruling that is taking place is of great significance to "freedom of speech".

In 1925, Minnesota passed a state law, the mitigation of public nuisance act.

It stipulates that no one is allowed to engage in the daily manufacture, publication, dissemination, possession, sale or donation of newspapers, magazines or other publications that are malicious, slanderous and defamatory.

Perhaps in some people's eyes, this regulation is perfectly normal, but it is the opposite.

In 1927, the Saturday news of Minnesota claimed that Jewish gangsters controlled gambling, smuggling and fraud in Minneapolis.

However, the municipal government and law enforcement agencies failed to perform their duties effectively, and the sharp and even "excessive" accusations in the newspapers have angered some people.

County judge Floyd Olson filed a lawsuit against the Saturday news.

Referring to the mitigation of nuisance to the public act, the district court declared the newspaper public waste and banned its distribution permanently.

Unless the newspaper publishers can prove to the court that they no longer publish slander and slander.

It was 1928 when the publisher refused to accept the appeal. The Supreme Court upheld the original judgment.

Jay Neal, the publisher, once again filed a lawsuit with the Federal Supreme Court on the ground that he enjoyed the freedom of the first amendment to the constitution.

Just today, October 18, 1931, pumpkin day, the case will be finally heard.

The Supreme Court, chief justice Charles Evans Hughes, wrote the judgment on behalf of the Supreme Court.

Here we want to explain the power of the Federal Supreme Court. The judicial independence of the Supreme Court, which is not regulated by the president and Congress, has the final power to interpret the constitution.

Therefore, the judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States is national in nature, and there will be no strange work between the state government and the federal government.

You can also think of it as the decision-maker of the "rules of the game" of America, for a lot of time.Families like Rockefeller and Morgan have to bow to the rules.

"Overturning the decision of the Minnesota Supreme Court and making the law on public waste unconstitutional,

the quality and conduct of government officials must be publicly debated and freely discussed in the media."

This means that Nick won the case. The principle of prohibition of pre restriction was established in the "Neil suit" of the Federal Supreme Court on this day in 1931.

The frenzy of public opinion and attention aroused by this incident among the American people is nationwide.

People gathered spontaneously in the city, waiting for the final news.

Everyone wants to know whether the declaration of independence formulated by the founding leader in the first congress still represents the foundation of the country.

40 minutes after the verdict was issued, the relevant reports spread all over the city.

Even in remote towns, there are people who celebrate with citizens from all over the country on the radio.

This is a victory for all. No one can deprive citizens of their right to "free speech".

The atmosphere of the pumpkin festival has become very lively because of the verdict, which represents the victory of American citizens.

So on Li Zitao's way home, you can almost see that every household is dressed up in their own pumpkin lanterns.

"What happened today?" Back home, Li Zitao asked in surprise.

After learning from his fiancee the whole story of the nick case, Li Zitao first thought of, "is this the beginning of the American people's mouth blowing?"

His conjecture is correct at all. Before the nick case, comments and attacks on the government and officials were still conservative.

It was this incident that further confirmed the rights and interests of the press and citizens, and made the definition of "freedom of speech" clearer.

Anyone can express their opinions in public publications, which is further freedom of the press.

It also represents the formal birth of "news supervision".

Meanwhile, at the Los Angeles Times headquarters, Harry CHANDLEY is celebrating with colleagues in his office.

From today on, Newsweek's positioning will be clearer.

"Tell Brown that all previous restrictions have been lifted, and from today on, he will judge the federal government with the most incisive, intuitive, impartial and neutral attitude."

Harry CHANDLEY is about to be happy. This guy named Neil is so cute in his eyes.

It took him four years to give the Federal Supreme Court a clearer and intuitive explanation and affirmation of the first amendment.

"Maybe I should go to the gate of Washington and greet our idiot president with the kindest words."

Harry took the vodka out of his glass and thought about how to vent his excitement.

www.novelhall.com , the fastest update of the webnovel!