Chapter 734

Lei Tiantang, of course, has noticed the public opinion in these two days. He also brushes the news during meals and breaks every day, especially about the company's news. Even if the Propaganda Department of the company is concerned about public opinion, he still has to master the specific situation.

Therefore, he has no objection to Jiang Yuting and the company's top management to hold a special meeting to discuss this issue. Although he himself does not think it is a big deal, the company's top management does not think so.

From the strategic level, these senior executives of the company still view the issue from the perspective of ordinary people, so they think that international law will bring trouble to the company.

But Lei Tiantang knows that he can't blame them because they don't know what kind of cards he has mastered, which can make him calm about the matter. Therefore, he still came to attend the meeting to give them a bottom.

So when he saw them all turning their eyes to themselves, he said with a confident smile: "I have paid attention to the news of these two days, and there is no big problem in your response. On the contrary, I don't think it is necessary to worry about you!

As for the fact that they want to expand and refine the moon agreement in international law, I don't think we need to over interpret it.

As we all know, since the "agreement on the moon" involves the development, utilization and sharing of the moon resources and other issues closely related to the vital interests of all countries, although the agreement has been widely recognized on the surface, all countries are cautious. So far, few countries have ratified it, and the United States and polar bear and other major space countries have not added it China has not joined.

Which aerospace power would like to join such an agreement to tie a rope to itself? And even if the United States and his younger brothers can quarrel to let more countries join in such an agreement, what's the use?

According to the "moon agreement", it is only an agreement. How much binding capacity can an agreement have? So even if the United States and its younger brothers join the agreement, they are just tying a bundle of straw rope to themselves, and they can ignore it at any time!

Even if the United States is a small part of the international law, it still violates the international law? Who really takes it seriously? That is to say, it's very useful for small countries with poor strength! "

His words also made people in the conference room nod in succession. They are all elites. Of course, they understand such things more clearly.

The reason why the United States and other countries dare to openly violate international law is not because the international law has relatively low binding force on him!

Take the United States as an example. Since it became the world's leader in the war, the United States has always pursued the principle of hegemonism and the supremacy of its own national interests. What they generally agree with is "national priority" and "power logic".

In 1999, NATO, led by Laos and the United States, bypassed the United Nations, ignored international law and norms of international relations, and carried out air attack on Yugoslavia, causing heavy casualties, which was strongly condemned by the world public opinion.

2018, the US President trump announced that they had combined England and France to strike a precise blow on Syria's military facilities.

There is no doubt that such a direct military attack bypassing the United Nations violates international law. However, it is not only the United States, but also England and France. Greece and Cyprus have provided support for the attack.

More military actions have shown that international law is really a joke for these countries. It can be used when it is used, and no one will take it seriously when it is useless!

Therefore, under such circumstances, international law has no way to deal with Laos and the United States. Both economic strength and military strength of the United States rank first. Therefore, under such circumstances, international law has no binding force on Laos and the United States, which is also due to its hegemonism.

A national security adviser of the United States once wrote an article claiming that "in order to safeguard national interests, Laos and the United States do not need to abide by international law.".

In fact, in today's world, it is not only the United States, polar bears or some countries that just do not say, it is all like this. However, for a large number of old beauties, the constitution of the United States is the law that can not be violated, and this is the foundation of the rule of law for the old Americans.

As Lei Tiantang said, in fact, international law is only international agreement and commitment, with moral responsibility, but not "legal binding force". Therefore, international law is useful when it is beneficial to the country of the United States, but it is useless when it is not.

After the "9.11" incident, lawyers of the US Justice Department said in an important memorandum that the president and the US Army would not have to abide by any international law on the issue of prisoners of war in the war on terror.

The memorandum made it clear that any international law, including the law of war, which should normally be observed, is not binding on the United States, because these international laws have no legal status in the federal law of the United States.

Therefore, the practice of the United States is that if the international law is beneficial to the interests of the United States, then the United States will take the international law as the banner, and if the international law is detrimental to the interests of the United States, then no matter how correct the international law is, the United States will ignore it.In fact, it is not only the United States that does not abide by international law. Baga also has at least a few infamous examples, such as whaling, trying to change the conclusion of World War II, and the bird reef problem. These are typical cases in which big countries ignore international law.

Seeing that everyone agrees with his statement, Lei Tiantang continues this topic.

"So in the final analysis, if you want to have strength, you can ignore this thing! We can also ignore the things that America can ignore!

We have to abide by the laws that our country and other countries have unanimously recognized and abided by. We also maintain such a legal order. However, the moon agreement that they want to strengthen these two days is obviously an unfair law against us, and this kind of "law" can be ignored for us!

And the reason why I came to hold this meeting with you to discuss this issue is that I want to give you a formal explanation once again, that is, our infinite gravitation group has the strength to ignore the so-called "law" that is unfavorable to us!

I can't tell you the detailed cards. If I tell you from the side, you can know more or less. That is, the cards I hold are no worse than those of any big country! "

www.novelhall.com , the fastest update of the webnovel!