(Seeking monthly ticket~)
The influence of the teacher union is indeed great, especially when seeking the benefits of the entire industry, people will subconsciously think that the bottom teachers are the biggest beneficiaries, but they are not!
First of all, the income of public school teachers is not high, it can even be said to be very low and it is a dead salary. There is no way. This is also a manifestation of the undiscriminatory treatment of the union. For lawyers, the treatment of teachers is very bad.
The salary is not high. Relatively speaking, the working environment and work pressure faced by teachers are indeed worse. In some low-income community schools with high crime rates, teachers are even facing the danger of fighting, fighting, and even shooting. Life is making money, it’s not bad to be safe, but also considering the quality of teaching?
Good work is the same as bad work. The difficulty of work and the environment have become worse with the polarization of the rich and the poor in society. This has created an extreme situation of passive sabotage by the bottom teachers for a long time.
Even those rookies with ideals and abilities who have just entered the workplace can only wear out their enthusiasm and energy in the environment of survival of the fittest, and the number of teachers with low level will increase invisibly. The teaching burden of high-level teachers is a vicious circle.
Although those extremely incompetent teachers will be sent to the transfer center to wait for the hearing process, they can still enjoy full salary and benefits during the long hearing period.
Due to the union's intervention, the entire hearing process can take up to three years.
In the transfer center in New York, there are a total of 700 public teachers who are doing nothing to wait for the hearing. Some of them involve absenteeism, offenses and even xing harassment, but New York zf spends more than 100 million U.S. dollars each year to support these without a penny. Contribution of waste snacks.
Logically speaking, in this situation, Besidworth's proposal should be able to get the support of some teachers.
But the result is obvious, without the union's resistance, the lower-level teachers can drown her with one spit.
why? Because Besidworth is depriving them of the last bit of welfare.
Waste teachers do not want their income to decrease, and good teachers have been working hard for so many years to retain the last trace of dignity as a teacher, but they have to face the ‘penalty’ of a continuous decrease in income. This is absolutely unacceptable to them.
Therefore, in this proposal, almost 99% of the teachers will stand together, regardless of good or bad.
The union is happy to hear about it. They can once again speak out in the name of all members, express their demands and show their growing influence. Look, we don’t even care about the long face of education.
By the way, it’s worth mentioning that even if the teacher’s welfare benefits have dropped again and again, the income and welfare of public school teachers are still higher than that of private school teachers. Today, the average annual income of public school teachers is 56,000 US dollars, which is the average of private schools. The annual income is 44,000 U.S. dollars, and public school teachers still have pensions. Yes, they are pensions that have almost disappeared in the United States, but private school teachers cannot enjoy it.
The root of this strange phenomenon still comes from trade unions. They have strong bargaining power, that is, the right to collective bargaining.
The right to collective bargaining means that employers can only talk with unions, not individuals. For example, the teachers' union requires a 6% salary increase this year. Then zf can only bargain with the union, but cannot negotiate with a single member.
Of course, if the talks are completed, the specific salary adjustment within the teachers union is the task of the teachers union itself. According to the current popular standard, it is actually based on seniority ranking. They have a set of very open rules for distributing benefits. You can get more, and those with only a few years of teaching experience will get less.
If zf says that it has no money and wants to lay off staff, then the teachers union will follow its own internal rules to let teachers with relatively low qualifications, even those with very high education levels, go first.
In short, zf, as an employer, must not bypass the teachers' union. For example, if a teacher performs well, she can directly raise her salary, no! A particularly good teacher was fired, even if parents and students keep staying~
This is the power of trade unions. They have a huge influence on zf, especially the zf led by the donkey party, so teachers unions have a huge advantage in negotiations. Some things do not need to read the news, and they know that teachers unions can laugh. To the end.
It doesn't matter if zf borrows money from the Federal or the bank. As for whether it can be repaid, it is not within their consideration. The mess is left to the next session. I am only responsible to my supporters.
On the contrary, the private school teacher’s negotiating table is opposite to the capitalists. Capitalists don’t need to worry about votes, and they don’t have much money to squander freely. Moreover, private schools must face strong market competition. When negotiating, private school teachers are obviously There is no strong bargaining power This is the reason why the income of teachers in private schools is much worse than that in public schools.
However, teachers are still willing to teach in private schools, because the educational environment in private schools is better, allowing teachers to use their talents, and there are some things that can’t just look at the average. Many private schools have high tuition fees and teachers’ salary levels. Nature rises.
But there is a prerequisite for all this, that is, private schools must have a steady stream of students in order to ensure that the school continues to operate, and teachers can have food. If the source of students plummets, the income of teachers will not be guaranteed.
Because of this, Besidworth’s proposal is equivalent to directly stabbing two hornet’s nests, and they are both the most poisonous and most poisonous. Who will they not prevent you from organizing?
And once the two major trade unions and public and private schools collectively protested, the brave Donald would probably have to succumb. He is not stupid. In order to offend the country's largest power group, can his throne still sit securely?
After thinking about this, Besidworth had no choice but to ask for help. She could accept that the proposal failed and the implementation of the Zheng policy was blocked, but she must not allow herself to fall to the top of the last step.
So she accepted Yang Cheng's suggestion, and since she couldn't meet everyone's needs, she would first divide the party with the greatest power and sit in the position she deserves before she can continue to fight against others.
Morgenthau did know Nathan Sanders, there was no need to hide this.
But he bluntly said, "Nathan will not support you, he is also seeking re-election, your proposal is very unfriendly to aft~"
Bessedworth smiled, "Mr. Morgenthau, I just want to meet him~"
Morgenthau frowned slightly, "If you just meet, you don't need to find me through Jason, I know what you think, and you want to put pressure on Nathan through me..."