How to add one to share copyright as a co-author. Consensus and the joint exercise of copyright cannot be reached by consensus. Kinoe B has the right to exercise any of these rights except for the assignment of copyright. Therefore, Kinoe uploads the novel to the Internet without your permission, which is an act of dissemination of information on the network. Does not constitute a one-to-one. If you share the copyright of the cooperative work, the link to Kinoe’s blog is not infringing, since. Since the behavior uploaded by Kinoe is not infringing. With the copyright shared by co-authors, then the act of setting up a link will not constitute infringement. Similarly, Ding did not infringe Ding’s copying and distribution of works. He got the false consent of the co-authors, which is enough! keep it up! In addition, when a consensus cannot be reached, the author has the right to inadvertently allow the work to be copied by others. Hair style, but the income should be reasonably distributed. AKinoe’s publishing rights and information network dissemination rights. The photos taken together cannot be used separately. The family has inadvertently allowed to exercise any copyright except for the transfer, including publication and information network dissemination. The fake fan uploading it to the Internet does not constitute B. Infringement of shared copyright, therefore a mistake. Closing the screen lightly harmed the family’s right to spread information on the Internet. The behavior uploaded by Kinoe does not constitute an illegal act. Infringement of the copyright shared by the cooperative works. It doesn’t exist than the act of setting up a link, and the help and expansion of the infringement will not constitute infringement. Sundi like Kinoe B sent the golf preparation period to throw constitutes an infringement error. And with the false permission of the co-authors, they have the right to copy and distribute. It does not constitute an infringement of the copyright shared by a pair of cooperative works. The reproduction rights and distribution rights of the Fifth Publishing House in Qinghai. This one. He is wrong, I just made a mistake. Who chooses this bass? He reposted this article on his blog without permission. Without the permission of any one of Kinoe B, he stared at this An act, which constitutes the right to disseminate information on the work network. He did not have the consent of any one of his collaborators. So Ding. He chooses the photo. People in Zhuzhou group have already sent remuneration, but they still infringe on the information network dissemination right of copyright, so it is correct. My behavior does not constitute an infringement, because it has been copied and distributed by a cooperator. The act does not constitute infringement, so d is wrong. The answer to this question is c. The ownership of the copyright of the second untrusted work. A principle. Two exceptions. Principles of copyright law. Article 17. A work commissioned by B. Who does the copyright belong to? The trustee Kinoe and the trustee have agreed to follow the agreement. If there is no agreement, the copyright belongs to the trustee Ai. What rights does the client’s hometown have? He wants to bear all the bears for free within the agreed scope of use. There is no agreement that the price of the false bear range of the principal is free to use within the range of the creation purpose entrusted by the owner. For example, Kinoe commissioned B to design a trademark for himself. The originality of a trademark without a design is a work. But if the family does not agree on the ownership of the copyright, then the copyright belongs to it. Huh? However, Jia Xiang has agreed to use this trademark for free within the scope of use as a trademark. Copying, publishing, information, and network dissemination are games that do not require registration confirmation. This is the principle, but there are two exceptions. The rules are abstract. Copyright infringement and copyright dispute interpretation articles 13 and 14. Article 14 of the first week. The living person entrusts others to create a production work for himself. What is an autobiographical work? It is a biography narrated in the first person. “The first half of my life”, what Liu Xiaoqing and I had to say, I and Hua Niantou, this autobiography was alive in those years. Please entrust B to create an autobiography for yourself. Timely autobiographical works. So who does the copyright of this autobiographical work belong to? The trustee Kinoe, if the trustee has an agreed agreement and there is no agreement, the copyright belongs to the specific character and the trustee Kinoe. This is an exception. The second exception. Have a hug. The second exception, this is Article 13 of the Interpretation, which is written by someone else. I review and finalize reports, speeches and other works published in my name. Who does his copyright belong to? A secretary writes. But because the leader has the report and speech that the leader reviews and publishes in the name of the leader. Who does his copyright belong to? The copyright of the works that constitute a legal person belongs to the legal person. The copyright of works that do not constitute a legal person belongs to the reporter and the speaker. Speaker and speech. Then the author can pay appropriate remuneration. There is a team of secretaries writing. I have reviewed the final version of the report b I have published the report under my false name, and the speech has the copyright ownership. If it belongs to the legal person work of the unit where the leader belongs, of course the copyright belongs to the unit. No, anyway, the copyright of the work belongs to the speaker. what? The actual author can then pay appropriate remuneration. To be concise. Question 17 of 2006. ..