"How is it possible ?? Yong Berry played?"
"Is the fourth official mistaken? Manchester City actually replaced Darren Bent with Yongberg?"
"Torrez is off the court. Bent is the only striker on Manchester City. Why did Wan Sheng choose to replace Darren Bent?"
"Darren Bent hasn't performed much before, but his role in the front is still very obvious. At least, he attracted Chelsea's defensive attention. It is not only tactical, but Yongberg can not replace ..."
"Yong Baili? Where is he playing?"
"..."
Many people have similar doubts. They do not understand this substitution. The most important thing is that Darren Bent is replaced, which means that there will not be a striker in Manchester City's lineup.
After Yong Berry played, Manchester City had 11 players on the field, with 1 goalkeeper, 3 guards, 7 midfielders ... is there a more exotic lineup than this? Seven midfielders, what is Manchester City doing?
Seeing this substitution, no one can understand it. Even Manchester Television, which supports Manchester City, has questions about substitutions, or even ... doubts! !
"Wan Sheng may have made a wrong substitution. Even if he wants to strengthen his defense, he should be replaced with a defender, such as Dunn, who has been on the bench!"
"Yong Berry's abilities are comprehensive, but he is by no means a qualified guard or striker!"
"Without a striker, what will Manchester City do next?"
"Wufeng?"
Some people have proposed this concept, but any time they hear the concept of "Wufeng", they will feel very funny, and when they see it, it is almost impossible.
Even though Manchester City is playing the world's most advanced technical football, the concept of ‘no front’ is still too high, and this tactic basically exists only in theory.
In various analysis of comments, there are also professional football commentators who believe that Manchester City is going to play ‘no front’ tactics, but they just put forward concepts and explain some theoretical ways of playing. But they don't think Manchester City can play well, because this tactic is too demanding on the team and the players.
A football commentator quipped, "This Manchester City's strength has not yet" rushed out of the earth and flew into the universe. "Perhaps they can rely on the" no front "to beat some small clubs, and can play against Chelsea of the same level. It's too risky. "It means that Manchester City will play better with the usual formation and good tactics.
Also. Other media believe that "Manchester City actually wants to strengthen defense."
"They are the first in the league. They played against Chelsea. The draw was fully acceptable. A draw was enough for them to continue to remain undefeated in the league. They tied Arsenal's unbeaten record of 49 rounds. In short, Manchester City is to defend. Are there strikers It doesn't matter at all, just to fight back. Morris, Ozil and others are enough ... "
The analysis that followed was that of Manchester City's "conservative". It criticized the "conservative ideas" and "utilitarian football ideas" that Wan Sheng only wanted to tie, and launched some criticisms and the like.
The media that spoke these things obviously didn't have much affection for Manchester City and Wansheng.
But this statement has been recognized by many people. From another perspective, anyone in Wansheng's position may choose to do this, which is most beneficial to Manchester City.
In addition, this can also be explained. "Why Manchester City chose to replace the only forward on the field."
Compared to the media, it is more important to consider the plan for the replacement of Wansheng, is Chelsea coach Grant.
The match between two teams at the same level is also a direct competition between the coaches of the two teams. If one party makes substitution adjustments. If the other party does not know what this adjustment means, it will undoubtedly fall in the tactical response.
Grant encountered this situation.
He didn't quite understand the reason why Manchester City replaced Darren Bent. One is as the media said. Darren Bent is Manchester City's only forward and two. Previously, Darren Bent did not perform that bad. Normally, he should not be replaced. In retrospect, Torres was replaced in the first half, which was also confusing.
Grant couldn't understand it at all.
He was a little puzzled in his head and looked closely at the game closely, hoping to find the reason for Manchester City's substitution adjustment.
Wan Sheng was very serious standing on the sidelines.
The substitution decision he just made was made by him, and only he knew the purpose of substitution in the entire stadium.
There is nothing wrong with the media thinking, replacing Darren Bent, one of the purposes is to strengthen the defense, the reason is very simple, Yong Berry can play the midfielder, he and Elano Bloomer can form a double midfielder, then the ball The team will form a combination of 3 guards and 2 midfielders in the backcourt. Undoubtedly, the defense will become tighter.
Another reason for substitutions is to strengthen the control of the midfield and backcourt.
In the face of Chelsea ’s previous life, Manchester City ’s backcourt defense was somewhat unstable. The team cannot guarantee the stability of the defense, so it is necessary to strengthen the defense. The key point for the two teams to compete is still in the midfield. The team has multiple midfielders. However, Ozil, Silva and others are better at attacking, and the goal of changing to Yong Berry is to strengthen the ability of the 'midfield and backcourt'.
After guaranteeing the defense, a game with Chelsea can guarantee a word of ‘stable’, at least not to allow the opponent to easily break through the team ’s defense line like the first half.
After ensuring stability, Wan Sheng did not think that the team's offense would be much worse, because the team's usual training will also train a `` rotating forward '' positioning method.
Rotating forwards, as the name implies, means that players rotate forwards to ensure that there are always players in front. In general, this is to ensure that there are people in every position of the team, such as the goal scored by Ozil, Morris After getting the ball and pushing it directly into the air, Ozil just received the pass.
However, in the absence of forwards, it is difficult to guarantee the team's offensive efficiency simply by relying on the forward rotation.
As analyzed by the media, the player skills and team coordination of the "Wufeng" tactics are too high. At present, Manchester City cannot really play the "Wufeng tactics". Otherwise, in the summer, Wansheng will not try to introduce it. Torres is here to replace Anelka.
In a normal game, having a striker is always more efficient than not having a striker.
But that is only about offense.
To play against Chelsea, we must first ensure the defense. As for the contribution in the game, among the first few players, Darren Bent has the smallest contribution to the game. He hardly participates in the defense. Under the strict defense of the Chelsea defenders, the offense can only play a tactical role.
Therefore, Wansheng chose to replace Darren Bent and use the concept of ‘rotating forward’ to allow midfield players who are idle on offense. Take turns to play the role of forward players.
This can make it difficult for Chelsea to make targeted defenses. Second, it also strengthens the control of the midfield. It also strengthens the defense. The two aspects of strengthening only sacrifice one tactical forward.
Wan Sheng thinks. This is worth it.
Of course, this is a targeted adjustment, and the specific effect will still be seen in the game, so Wan Sheng looks at the game very seriously, and hopes to summarize some experience of tactical adjustment and application from the game.
Now Manchester City and Chelsea match, from the score point, Manchester City still have a certain advantage.
The score was 3: 3 and both teams scored three goals.
But don't forget, this is the game at Stamford Bridge Stadium. Chelsea is a team that does not belong to Manchester City at all.
If the two teams end the game with a draw, Manchester City almost wins, because they guarantee that they will continue to be undefeated, and they will not lose to Chelsea away. At the same time, it is like some media "provocation" before the game, Chelsea became Manchester City chase Ping Arsenal's undefeated record 'stepping stone'.
So in fact, Chelsea cannot accept a draw.
In the second half, after Manchester City completed the substitutions, the game situation. Manchester City also has a certain advantage. After 20 minutes have passed, according to the statistics of Sky TV, Manchester City's ball control rate has reached 57%. That's a lot more than 43% of Chelsea. In addition, Manchester City have 4 shots and Chelsea only 2 times.
From the shooting data, we can see that as Manchester City strengthened its defense. The game between the two teams has become much dull.
But the data also shows the role of Wan Sheng in making substitution adjustments, "Although the game scene has become dull, Manchester City have an advantage. The two teams were equal in the attack before, but now Manchester City have the opportunity in front of the door Significantly higher than Chelsea ... "
This is the role!
To illustrate with data, the two teams have equal offense opportunities in the first half. For example, both sides have 10 chances before. Now Manchester City has become 6, and Chelsea has become 3. Although the chances of both sides have decreased, Manchester City has obviously Has an advantage.
However, after Darren Bent got off the court, Manchester City's offensive problems have become prominent. Relying on the 'forward rotation' alone, it obviously cannot be compared with having a real striker. Sometimes Manchester City's cooperation will have loopholes, such as After Morris passed the ball, he found that there was no one in the front position. For example, Ozil kicked the ball into the penalty area, but no teammates stepped forward to fight, which is equivalent to giving the ball to Chelsea in vain.
This is the general situation of the second half of the game.
At this time, the game reached the 70th minute, Chelsea coach Grant sitting in the position, a little hesitant.
After a period of competition, he also saw the purpose of Manchester City's substitutions, so the question posed before him-should he strengthen the offense, or a solid defense?
In other words, is the team taking risks to win, or is it trying to hold the draw?
The former is going to take a lot of risk, the latter needs to take a small risk, but the goal is not to be able to defend the goal, maybe the next moment, Manchester City will find an opportunity to score the ball, forcing him to make a choice.
Offense and defense, making choices is difficult.
In fact, the key issue is that Grant wants the team to win, but the risk of strengthening the offense is still too great, so he decided to watch it for a while.
Grant soon regretted it!
The game is constantly changing, and many times a certain player suddenly has a good performance, which can create an opportunity for the team and even change the situation of the game.
This is David Silva's wonderful running position!
Since the start of the second half of the game, David Silva has not been outstanding, the key point is that he is not a player who likes to find opportunities.
Ozil and Ivan Kruh are diametrically opposed. Both of them like to plug in at the right time.
In the absence of a forward, the midfielder five-man combination is at the forefront of the formation, so Ozil and Ivan Kruk, often playing the role of forwards.
This time David Silva found a good opportunity.
When Ozil received a pass from Morris, he did not rush to give the ball to his teammates, but he took the ball away to intercept Mikel, and then he gave the ball to Morris.
At the same time, David Silva has thrown away Carvalho and rushed to the left of the penalty area.
David Silva's movement was surprising. Carvalho failed to keep up with it. As a result, Morris' pass came in front of David Silva in a timely manner.
David Silva pressed with excitement, took another step forward, and swung his right foot directly against the ball!
"Boom!"
"Silva's shot!"
Sky TV commentator George Woodgate followed the high drink, but Chelsea goalkeeper Cech performed very well, and he accurately hit the ball with both fists.
The Manchester City fans in the stands suddenly felt sorry.
"It was a good opportunity just now, but Cech responded very quickly, which is a pity ..."
George Woodgate said that the offense on the field did not seem to be over. The football reached Morris. He was hit by Lampard and Belletti and guarded the ball to the bottom line.
Lampard did not continue to keep up, but slowly ran through the pass that blocked Morris, and Belletti followed Morris, compressing his dribbling space once and blocking Morray with his body. Between Sri Lanka and the goal.
Morris took the ball to the bottom line.
This position can no longer go forward, he can only protect the ball with his body to prevent the opponent from snatching it, or destroy the ball, and Morris also glanced around with his eyes, as if to give the ball to his teammates.
In Belletti and Lampard's view, this may also be the only choice that Morris can make. They will not let Morris pass the ball easily, so they are pressing Morris.
Yongberg ran to meet, but Morris couldn't pass the ball.
At this time, Morris pushed back hard, followed by gently knocking the ball, and suddenly turned in the direction of the football's rolling, while waving his right foot at a small angle.
Belletti failed to stop it for the first time.
Next time, Morris's right foot dexterously rubbed on the grass, and the football immediately followed the dribble to the sky!
Beletti almost could only watch the football go around from the top of his head. He turned his head in shock and saw that there was no Manchester City player in the small penalty area before he relaxed.
But there was a shout of Lampard from the ear, "Be careful, Peter!"
As Lampard exclaimed, I saw football circumvented Beletti's head lightly, and then passed high above Cech's head, falling straight down to the far corner.
The people who saw this ball ~ www.novelhall.com ~ are almost stunned!
Many of them have not realized what happened. Some Chelsea players only feel safe without opponents in front of the goal. Manchester City players are also a bit puzzled. They do n’t understand what Morris is doing. Is it a bad pass? ?
Fans in the stands also did not understand, some media commentators also shouted, "Morris's cross ..." Then they saw Chelsea goal, there are no Manchester City players.
At the next moment the football fell, many talents realized what happened because the football hit the post!
"Boom!"
With the collision between the football and the goalpost, no one had time to do anything. The player in front of the goal blocked the line of sight. What happened next can only be seen through slow motion, but the action of the referee has told everyone the answer .
"The referee's action, ah? The goal is valid !?"
PS: Little X rushing to the street, begging for genuine subscription support ~ (to be continued.)