Chapter 1038： Top of the Controversy

\"&　　"’ Nicholas McLenna wrote a news report as expected, but, surprisingly, he wrote at the beginning, “Why is Hugo making negative news again? Why is Hugo again! "

This opening seems to be accusing the media, but it also seems to be accusing Hugo, which is a bit of a "" style, but obviously, Nicholas has followed Hugo for nearly two years, and he is hailed as Hugo's "No. "In order", this name does not come out of thin air, he naturally will not be as vague as the "Chicago Tribune".

"Although the whole incident has only been two days since it broke out, I still can't help but want to review the whole incident.

The cause of the incident was that a paparazzi broke into the shop run by Hugo’s father and caused a physical conflict. Hugo’s father picked up a shotgun to drive out the intruder. After the news broke, it triggered a series of widespread reactions. Some news media pointed the finger at Hugo, believing that Hugo’s father had emotional control problems, and suspected that Hugo also had a mental illness. Then a series of questions about Hugo’s achievements were raised.

In fact, all this is ridiculous. Every listener has the answer to the quality of Hugo's music; and whether Hugo's performance on the big screen of the movie is outstanding, every audience also sees it. Opportunities are reserved for those who are prepared. Obviously Hugo is like that. He seized the opportunity in front of him to carry forward his talent.

As for those who question the ‘source of opportunity’, they are simply absurd and ridiculous. Because Hollywood is a place full of opportunities, opportunities can be seen everywhere, but not everyone can seize the opportunity, not everyone who seizes the opportunity can achieve success.

What's more, those chaotic voices have no factual basis at all, they are purely the media's own speculation, which makes people have to think again.

As Hugo said in response, ‘please show evidence’. He is not afraid of doubts, challenges, or rumors. He always straightens his waist and faces any rumors. This is what an outstanding artist really deserves.

So, why did such a thing develop to the point it is now? And why is there so much multimedia unity that wants to question Hugo's achievements?

Things can be explained very complicated, but they can also be explained very simple: benefits.

Some people may condemn Hugo's attitude toward the media as rude, cold, and rude, so almost all media are exaggerating a core point: Hugo is challenging the authority of the media! But before torturing Hugo’s attitude, please don’t ignore the fact that the media first violated Hugo’s father-it was an ordinary person, an ordinary old man, so Hugo became angry and Hugo lost control because of him. I was so disappointed and angry with the media's actions that I couldn't suppress my inner anger at all.

Hugo was at fault, but the media that initiated the provocation were not innocent. When the media, which is supervised and targeted by public opinion, evolves into profit-first businessmen, do they still have authority for Hugo to challenge?

The paparazzi personally rushed to the home of Hugo’s father in order to dig out the hot spots, breaking the peaceful life of an ordinary person who had nothing to do with the entertainment industry; in order to dig out the hot spots, the reporter compared Hugo’s father’s legitimate defense with the previous Hugo’s youth. Connected with frivolousness, without any evidence, conducted absurd and unreliable inferences such as'domestic violence'; in order to discover the hot spots, the media actually implemented the so-called emotional out-of-control directly, thereby inferring Hugo's emotional life and career The clues of the curve.

All this seems so incredible. When people sort out their ideas, they will probably find it ridiculous. However, with the help of the media, the incident gradually fermented and was pushed to a whole new height. It has risen above the confrontation between public figures and the media, and the whole thing has been raised above the supervision of public opinion and the contradiction with personal violence, thus detonating the discussion of the whole society!

This is a sad fact for the media, because they have lost the spiritual power that the media relies on.

Why did Hugo make negative news again? Why is Hugo again? The answer is simple: because Hugo is currently the most popular, focused, and commercial artist in Hollywood.

That's it. "

Nicholas's article is as sharp and accurate as ever, and at the same time it adds fuel to the current madness of the current storm of public opinion and pushes the whole incident to a whole new level. Just as the media reporters went online to amplify this incident into a war between public figures and the media, Nicholas also went online to raise the media's behavior to the level of harm to the entire news industry.

I have to say that Nicholas is indeed the "Hugo Imperial Pen." During the confrontation between Hugo and Anthony, Hugo directly ripped off all the fig leaves, revealing the internal violence and stigma in the media, and now Nicholas is even more so. Amplify this point infinitely, thus triggering a new round of discussion.

Complementing "" is the "New York Times". The support from the East Coast reveals the stability and profoundness of the metropolitan area. The "New York Times" directly raised the whole incident to the level of social issues.

"'"Get off the throne!"

The headline of the "New York Times" alone is enough to be sensational, and so is the content of the news.

"When the media chanted, but in order to obtain news clues, they did not compromise their means, from voyeurism, intrusion, bribery and other illegal investigation methods to distortion, slander, fabricating and other news writing techniques, it became; when the media chanted long live justice, Supervision by public opinion ignores the facts for the sake of a news breaking point. Not only did it fail to conduct public opinion supervision, but took the lead in stimulating social hatred and stimulating social conflicts. Rodney King became a stepping stone; when the media chanted news authority, they did it for the sake of Commercial interests ignore the truth, pursue the hot spots wholeheartedly, and even seduce the hot spots. Inducing illegal behavior, Hugo has become a dart target.

We must be very happy to see this scene: watching the reporter's nose yelling and ranting, watching Lancaster lose his mind because of the anger of quitting, watching Lancaster give everything to protect his father , Exhausted, watched Lancaster bravely confront the media and stretched out his middle finger.

The reason is very simple, because these are explosion points.

Compared to a sweet date with a couple, the destruction of a relationship by a third party is more eye-catching; compared to a gathering of friends, a close friend's fight is more attractive; compared to a prosperous career, behind-the-scenes is more intriguing... When the truth is no longer important, when news hits become the focus; when it is no longer important, when newspaper sales become the focus; when public opinion supervision is no longer important, when commercial interests become headlines, market orientation has quietly changed the nature of the media.

Now, more and more multimedia has abandoned the essence of the media in order to please the audience. The headlines are getting more and more horrible, the headlines are getting more and more exaggerated, the negative news is getting more and more serious, and the general market atmosphere has gradually changed. It is foreseeable that the sentence ‘’ has deviated from the original track. After being given commercial attributes, it has become a means for businessmen to seek huge profits. What they care about is not the truth, but the benefits.

According to this trend, one day in the future, the news media will no longer be noble, and the journalist profession will no longer be desirable. Everything is just the same interests, interests, and interests as Wall Street. Then, before that day arrives,'' Before the crown was crowned, he was about to step down from the throne.

‘I refuse to answer’, this is a response to the already commercialized media; a middle finger, this is Lancaster’s accusation of a reporter who has lost his essence.

Hidden behind this suspicion of ‘domestic violence’ is the degeneration of the entire news media industry. Everything is just like last year's incident. No one asked the truth, no one asked why, everyone just blindly followed the explosion, as if all the media were united, and then attacked Lancaster with the pen in his hand as a weapon. As a result, the news exploded, public opinion exploded, and the focus exploded. But no one noticed: In fact, this is a farce.

Does anyone really believe in the media's questioning of Hugo? Those speculations that are not supported by any arguments appear in major newspapers and magazines, only to reduce these media to the level of supermarket tabloids.

Take a look at the front-page headlines of today's major media. The **** is so sharp and neat, but it can't help making people feel chilly and sad, because this is the iron proof of stepping down from the throne. "

The support of the "New York Times" is undoubtedly very cryptic They did not really discuss the Hugo incident, but to see the origin through the incident itself, which can also be regarded as "" On the basis of the report, conduct a more in-depth discussion.

But even so, you can still feel the support of the "New York Times" for Hugo, not only the "New York Times" and the "New York Times", but also many other newspapers. They did not share the same hatred of the enemy because of the experience of the "journalists". On the contrary, They calmed down and deliberated carefully.

Although this time the incident was huge, it even rose to the level of confrontation between public figures and the media and to the level of abuse by the news media, but on the whole, the entire storm of public opinion was evenly matched. The people who cursed Hugo and those who supported Hugo were on the same level, and the incident went directly from a pure entertainment incident to a social problem.

In fact, this is indeed a social problem. Just as the "New York Times" worried, ten years later, the news media is no longer strong and the news media is no longer enviable. The pursuit of commercial interests overrides the importance of the truth. At that time, reporters were just reporters, an ordinary profession, and No longer the uncrowned king.

And all this collapse actually appeared as early as the nineties, and gradually exposed in the mid nineties. Surprisingly, the "Hugo Domestic Violence" incident became the fuse that caused this problem to surface, and it will continue for the next ten years. .